TN moves SC against Madras HC orders for CISF protection

The State government denies any lapse on the part of the TN police in protecting the Madras High Court and its judges against lawyers' violence.

Updated - November 17, 2021 02:13 am IST

Published - November 02, 2015 08:59 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

A view of the Madras High Court. File photo

A view of the Madras High Court. File photo

Denying any lapse on the part of the Tamil Nadu police in protecting the Madras High Court and its judges against lawyers' violence, the State government on Monday moved the Supreme Court challenging the High Court's orders to employ the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) for manning the High Court premises in both Chennai and Madurai.

In fact, the State government said it was delayed reaction from the Madras High Court that led to lawyers' agitation on September 14, 2015 going out of control, with advocates entering courtroom armed with placards demanding that Tamil be made the official language of the court.

In a strongly-worded petition, the State government accused the Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) changing its stance in the issue without notice. It said that the Centre had at first agreed that there was no need for deployment of CISF at the High Court premises, but then changed its position to demand Rs. 16.6 crore from the State government for sending in CISF personnel.

The State government said the High Court has erred in directing the State Police to work with the CISF to secure the High Court premises. It said such an arrangement would lead to the possibility of “severe confusion” in crunch situations.

It pointed out that the “High Court being a public premises where it is required to deal with public at large, the police personnel who are well versed with the local customs and language will be able to render more efficient services which the CISF will not be able to provide”.

Citing the incident of lawyers' agitation of September 14, 2015, the State argued that the agitating lawyers were themselves part of the judicial system, and thus could not be prevented from entering the High Court premises. State said that the hands of the police were tied because of a 2009 High Court order restricting police interference on court premises.

The State said the September 14 agitation would have been “nipped in bud” if the Registrar General, Madras High Court, had given them a timely green signal.

To repeated queries from the police brass the “Registrar General replied that the lawyers who were in the robes need not be prevented in entering the Court hall and that if the agitating lawyers raised slogans inside the court hall they may be removed after obtaining instructions from the Honourable Chief Justice”.

It was finally only at 8 pm that the police received the go-ahead from the Registrar General to remove the agitating lawyers from the court hall.

The State argued that a high-level meeting chaired by the Union Home Secretary on October 27 had witnessed the Centre agree to approach the Madras High Court with a plea to reconsider its order for CISF deployment.

However, inexplicably, the State said the MHA sent a communication the very next day for an advance payment of Rs. 16.6 crore to deploy the CISF. On October 30, the High Court had dismissed the State government's submissions and ordered the latter to deposit the amount within seven days.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.