Premature to test NJAC, govt. to plead before SC

A-G has said that its effect would materialise only after two months

Updated - November 16, 2021 05:10 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

The NJAC, notified on April 13, replaces the collegium system of judicial appointments with immediate effect.

The NJAC, notified on April 13, replaces the collegium system of judicial appointments with immediate effect.

With the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) law notified, the government may argue before the Supreme Court on Wednesday that it is still too “premature” for the court to test the new law, and should wait to see whether it falters.

A five-judge Bench, led by Justice Anil R. Dave, will start hearing on April 15 a clutch of petitions demanding that the law be declared “unconstitutional and void.”

The NJAC, notified on April 13, replaces the collegium system of judicial appointments with immediate effect.

Attorney-General Mukul Rohatgi said the law could be challenged only after the Act was implemented and its impact felt in a specific instance of judicial appointment.

Mr. Rohatgi said a “concrete case” illustrating the law’s effect on the public would materialise only a couple of months after the law was implemented.

'NJAC a required change'

During the first round of arguments on the admissibility of petitions on the National Judicial Appointments Commission, the Attorney-General dissuaded the judiciary from making “disembodied” decisions on matters of policy and laws to come into force. on the ground.

At the preliminary hearing before a three-judge Bench, Mr. Rohatgi termed the collegium system “completely illegal.” He described the NJAC as a “change” which should be “first allowed to work.”

“See how it works and then challenge it if necessary,” Mr. Rohatgi told the court. He had dismissed apprehensions about the judiciary losing its independence with the advent of the NJAC. “A change is required. You have to trust someone. You can’t police everything and have the police to police the police,” Mr. Rohatgi submitted. Countering him, senior advocate Fali Nariman, appearing for Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association, had called the NJAC Act a “still-born child.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.