Mala fide bid to favour tobacco industry: plea in court

July 29, 2010 11:35 pm | Updated 11:35 pm IST - New Delhi:

Reflecting the disappointment and grave concern felt by public health advocates over the Centre's decision to defer the new pictorial health warnings on tobacco products, the Health For the Millions (HFM) Trust has moved the Supreme Court. Acting on a petition from HFM, the Supreme Court earlier directed the Centre to ensure implementation of the pictorial health warnings. These were to come into force from June 1, 2010. However, the Centre on May 17 issued a notification deferring the implementation by six months. Now the HFM has filed an application seeking a stay on the notification.

According to the petitioner, the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003, was enacted to discourage and regulate consumption.

“The Act imposes progressive restrictions with a view to upholding the [people's] right to public health and achieving improvement of public health as enjoined by Articles 21 and 47 of the Constitution.”

“Deliberate delay”

But the implementation of the thrice-notified packaging and labelling warnings had been delayed by the government deliberately on industry representations. Hence, the new Rules 2010 would not be implemented forthwith.

The petitioner “seeks to ensure that the manufacturers have devised effective implementation plans for displaying the new pictorial warnings on the packages of tobacco products and given specific guidelines to their retail agents/distributors to abide by Rules 2010 by withdrawing the existing stock before the deadline of December 1, 2010.”

Stay notification

While the pictorial warnings were themselves not sufficient to educate the consumer, the Rules had been delayed repeatedly to favour the industry with no considerations of enabling consumers to take an informed decision on using tobacco products after being warned of the implications to their health. “It is a mala fide attempt to favour the industry,” the petitioner alleged and sought an interim stay on the notification.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.