India wants UN to declare more JeM men as terrorists

Jaish is known to have interests beyond South Asia

April 29, 2016 01:38 am | Updated December 04, 2021 11:01 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

Unfazed by China placing a “technical hold” on classifying Jaish-e-Mohammad founder Masood Azhar as a terrorist by the sanctions committee of the United Nations, India is ready with cases of other JeM individuals to place before the panel.

India believes that China, by siding with ally Pakistan, is turning a multilateral issue into a bilateral one given that the JeM is known to have interests beyond South Asia and was listed as a terrorist group by the U.N. in 2001 due to its linkages with al-Qaeda and Taliban.

“The cases of more individuals linked to the Jaish will be taken before the sanctions committee to designate them as terrorists,” a senior official dealing with the issue told The Hindu on Thursday.

“The Chinese don’t look good by siding with the Pakistanis on the issue. After all, we are talking about designating individuals. It is not a government-to-government issue at all,” the official said.

Also, the Indian action to designate Azhar as a terrorist was co-sponsored by the United States, the United Kingdom and France, revealing that Delhi was not alone in its efforts.

A “technical hold” on designating Azhar was placed by the Chinese earlier this month.

Simultaneously, India is engaging China on Azhar by talking to Pakistan at the just-concluded Foreign Secretary-level interaction in Delhi. China had publicly suggested that India hold direct talks with Pakistan on the issue.

“He [Indian Foreign Secretary] also brought up the listing of JeM leader Masood Azhar in the U.N. 1267 Sanctions Committee,” an official statement said after the talks, a reference that tells the Chinese that their request has been complied with.

On Pakistani response to the Azhar issue at the talks, a South Block official said: “They heard us out.”

A “technical hold” in the 15-member sanctions committee remains valid for six months following which a decision to block or proceed with the proposed action must be conveyed to the secretariat.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.