A divorce granted by ecclesiastical tribunal under Christian personal law is not valid as it cannot override the law, the Supreme Court said on Thursday
A Bench comprising Chief Justice J.S. Khehar and Justice D.Y. Chandrachud dismissed a plea filed by Clarence Pais, a former president of a Karnataka Catholic association, saying the issue has been settled by the court in its 1996 verdict delivered in the case of Molly Joseph versus George Sebastian.
“Canon Law [personal law of Christians] can have theological or ecclesiastical implications to the parties. But after the Divorce Act came into force, a dissolution or annulment granted under such personal law cannot have any legal impact as statute has provided a different procedure and a different code for divorce or annulment,” the apex court had then ruled.
Mr. Pais, in his PIL filed in 2013, had said the divorce granted by a Church, set up under its personal law, should be considered valid under the Indian common law as was done in the case of Muslims with regard to ‘triple talaq’.
Former Attorney General Soli Sorabjee, appearing for Pais, had contended that when oral ‘triple talaq’ could get legal sanctity for granting divorce to Muslim couples, why could Canon law decrees not be made binding on the courts of law.
He had alleged that many Catholic Christians, who married after getting divorce from Christian courts, faced criminal charges of bigamy as such divorces are not recognised by the criminal and civil courts.
