CSIR scientist dismissed for fabricating data

Committees that probed the matter reportedly found ‘hard evidence’ of the fraud by Mr. Cameotra

July 23, 2016 03:00 am | Updated September 18, 2016 03:48 pm IST - CHENNAI:

Swaranjit Singh Cameotra, a senior scientist at the Chandigarh-based Institute of Microbial Technology (IMTECH), a CSIR lab, was removed from service early this month for fabricating data in three papers published in 2013 (April 17, October 1 and October 8) in a scientific journal PLOS ONE . All the three papers were retracted by the journal in July 2014.

Data fabrication was found in four more papers where he was the senior author. This is the first time in recent years that the CSIR has taken the extreme step of terminating the service of a senior scientist for scientific misconduct.

In a retraction note published in July 2014, the journal said: “The Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) has carried out an investigation about several publications by this group [led by Dr. Cameotra] to evaluate concerns raised about the authenticity of the data. The investigation committee… concluded that there are no data available underlying this study and thus the published results are fabricated. As a result, [CSIR] has requested the retraction of the publication.”

Dr. Cameotra was senior scientist at the Environmental Biotechnology and Microbial Biochemistry Laboratory at IMTECH.

“It is not easy to issue a removal order of a government employee. There was a thorough enquiry by 2-3 committees and they found hard evidence… every committee gave a clear-cut decision,” said R.K. Sinha, who holds additional charge as Director of IMTECH.

Appeal to CSIR

According to Prof. Sinha, Dr. Cameotra has submitted an appeal to the Director-General of CSIR to reconsider the decision. He will still be eligible to apply for any other government job.

Speaking to The Hindu , Dr. Cameotra said tersely: “I have no comments.”

According to sources close to the investigation, he had admitted that there was no data to substantiate the claims made in the papers. Though he did not fabricate the data himself, as a senior scientist and senior author of the papers, he failed to check if the data were correct, a highly reliable source told The Hindu . The level of complicity and scientific misconduct had become clear even at an early stage of the investigation.

“In this case, the system was not found wanting,” said Prof. Sinha, referring to other cases where Indian scientists had got away with plagiarism, and data falsification and fabrication.

Data fabrication came to light when Georgia Tech, U.S. (where Fazlurrahman Khan, the first author of the papers who worked as a post doctoral fellow) found “similarity and overlapping of data presented in the papers and the work Dr. Khan had done while in the U.S.”

A committee formed by the IMTECH to investigate the matter found that Dr. Khan was responsible for fabricating the data. Dr. Khan has since resigned from IMTECH.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.