SC refuses to intervene in Pul govt formation

The Bench said the verdict in this case will not only have its effect in Arunachal Pradesh but its going to affect every state.

February 22, 2016 06:05 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 02:07 am IST - New Delhi

Remarking that the Arunachal Pradesh “experiment” to topple State governments may prove “deadly”, the Supreme Court on Monday refused to intervene in the >formation of the new government under dissident Congress leader Kalikho Pul , saying the highest judiciary has anyway the power and strength to put the clock back in the sensitive border State.

The five-judge Constitution Bench led by Justice J.S. Khehar is looking into the constitutionality of State Governor J.P. Rajkhowa's move to advance the Arunachal Assembly session, which eventually triggered a political crisis leading to the ouster of the Congress-led Nabam Tuki government and proclamation of emergency in the State on January 26, 2016.

Earlier in the day, the State's Congress leaders moved the apex court against the manner in which the President's rule was withdrawn without the apex court's knowledge and the formation of the Pul government in the next three hours on February 19.

“The Supreme Court hearing got over at 4 p.m. The proclamation of emergency is lifted at 6.30 p.m. and at 10 p.m., the new government under Kalikho Pul is sworn in on February 19,” senior advocate Kapil Sibal submitted.

“Arunachal Pradesh is an experiment... this is the way they will topple governments in other States. Everything we feared came true,” Mr. Sibal, accompanied by senior advocate Fali Nariman, submitted.

“If so, then this is a deadly experiment... there may be a thought that this is in distant Arunachal Pradesh. But even so, our judgment will have an impact all over the country,” Justice Khehar responded.

But the Bench refused to take up the issue of the formation of the Pul government, saying “this is a legislative matter and we will not interfere”.

The court told the Congress leaders that it should be allowed to comprehensively deal the issue rather than in a piecemeal, “hotch-potch” fashion.

Mr. Nariman pointed out that State Governor J.P. Rajkhowa was party to this litigation, his counsel was present in the courtroom on February 19, yet did not deem to inform the Bench about his plans to recommend to the President for withdrawal of the proclamation of emergency issued on January 26, 2016.

The senior lawyer said the court may continue to hear the case, but “meanwhile, they will buy more MLAs and go on to form a two-third majority”.

“You should have more confidence in us. We will consider all the issues. Please read the paragraph in the S.R. Bommai judgment on our powers of judicial review,” Justice Khehar said.

Mr. Sibal pointed out that in the interim between 6.30 p.m. to 10 p.m. - from the moment the President's rule was withdrawn to the formation of the Pul government – no government was in power in Arunachal Pradesh.

“Our Constitution does not allow such hiatus,” he submitted.

Mr. Sibal contended that the Nabam Tuki government was only in a state of “suspended animation” when President's rule was proclaimed. On its withdrawal, they should have been re-instated.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.