‘Nuclear nun’ handed jail term

The nun, 84-year-old Sister Megan Rice, was sentenced to three years jail for entering, in July 2012, one of the most secure nuclear weapons facilities in the world.

February 19, 2014 10:42 pm | Updated May 18, 2016 09:31 am IST - Washington

In this May 6, 2013 photo, anti-nuclear weapons activists, from left, Michael Walli, Sister Megan Rice and Greg Boertje-Obed arrive for their trial in Knoxville, Tennessee.

In this May 6, 2013 photo, anti-nuclear weapons activists, from left, Michael Walli, Sister Megan Rice and Greg Boertje-Obed arrive for their trial in Knoxville, Tennessee.

An 84-year-old U.S. nun was sentenced to three years jail for entering, in July 2012, one of the most secure nuclear weapons facilities in the world along with two colleagues, and splashing the building with human blood, and “daubing it with Biblical references” to peace and justice.

Sister Megan Rice was handed the jail term along with 62-month sentences given to two co-defendants in the case, Greg Boertje-Obed (58) and Michael Walli (64), all on charges of interfering with national security and damaging property at the Y-12 National Security Complex, which once supplied enriched uranium for the Hiroshima bomb.

Delivering the sentence Judge Amul Thapar said that Sister Rice “does not have the extensive criminal records the others have. Her crimes are minimal in comparison to the others”.

The nun and the two other Catholic anti-nuclear protestors admitted to hammering on exterior walls of the facility, spray-painting peace slogans and hanging banners, including messages such as “The fruit of justice is peace”.

When they were apprehended two hours after breaking into the restricted area they offered the guards food and began singing and reportedly offered to share a Bible, candles and white roses with the guards.

Last May the trio were convicted by a federal jury of damaging national defence premises under the Sabotage Act, a charge that carries a prison sentence of up to 20 years, and at a hearing in January 2014 they were ordered to pay $53,000 for what the government estimated was damage done to the facility.

Although their actions led to sharp criticism from the Department of Energy’s Inspector-General of security failures that made it possible for them to breach the bunker’s defences and the security contractor for the site was later fired, prosecutors declined petitions that argued for leniency on the grounds that the activists had exposed the facility’s weaknesses.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.