India needs time to define ties with US: Hagel

Washington is mindful of the sensitivity of India’s independence, says U.S. Defence Secretary.

Updated - December 04, 2021 11:27 pm IST

Published - August 08, 2014 09:34 am IST - Washington

U.S. Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel has hinted that Washington was willing to patiently wait for the Modi government to decide on its course of action on ties with the Obama administration.

U.S. Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel has hinted that Washington was willing to patiently wait for the Modi government to decide on its course of action on ties with the Obama administration.

U.S. Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel has said India should be given time and space to define the nature of its relationship with the U.S., indicating that the Obama administration was willing to patiently wait for the new government to decide on its course of action.

Hours before he landed in New Delhi on Thursday, Mr. Hagel told reporters travelling with him that the U.S. was mindful of the sensitivity of India’s independence.

“It has been an independent non-aligned nation since it became a democracy. We respect that. We take note of that. The people of India, like the people of any nation, deserve their decision-making space, and how they want not only their country to be perceived, but what foreign arrangements they want to make based on their terms,” he said on Thursday.

“I do think that there is always an issue when the greatest power on earth, the United States, develops relationships with countries. No country wants to be seen as a second cousin to the U.S. or any country. And that’s as it should be. So that’s not an issue,” he said.

He said the Obama administration must find ways to adjust India’s political requirements and handle its relationships, with the U.S. It always must be seen, like any arrangement, as an agreement on a project or a deal or a sale as good for both sides, he said.

Any decision India makes and any decision the U.S. makes, any decision any nation makes, is always and must be always predicated on the self-interest of that country, he said.

“I think that the promise, the potential of that nuclear agreement with India was not fulfilled to its full potential certainly as quickly as the United States had hoped, and I suspect India had hoped, but we always have to adjust and adapt and be patient with the realities of internal governments and their people,” he said.

Mr. Hagel said he hoped to present some new potentials during his meetings for ways the two countries could further connect with their own common interests.

“Over the last few years, we’ve done more joint exercises in military-to-military than we ever have. Our militaries have a very good relationship. India keeps its non-aligned status, its independent status. But that does not at all indicate they are disconnected from the world or the region, but that’s for them to decide,” he added.

Mr. Hagel said he was hoping for renewal of the Defence Framework Agreement, which expires next year, in his meetings with the Indian leaders.

“Second to see if we can make some progress on getting a better understanding from the Indians what specific projects they may have interest in that fit within the framework of the defence, trade and technology initiative,” he said.

“We’ve been working closely with the Indian governments at different levels on advancing these proposals that are on the table,” he said.

“Some I suspect have a more resounding interest by the Indians than others. I’d like to try to see if I can narrow those interests,” he said.

“India has many options to do many things with different partners on all fronts, and we’re well aware of that. So this is a high priority. It’s a high priority for me to continue to build on progress that we’ve made in the past,” he added.

Referring to the recent decisions by the Modi government to increase FDI in defence sector to 49 per cent, Mr. Hagel said “One of the things I want to see if I can understand more is more clarity on some of the numbers that have been laid down out there”.

“Ownership of up to 49 per cent, but what are the guidelines on that? How is that to be implemented? What’s the potential to go beyond that? So those would be areas that I will have an opportunity to explore”.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.