Whistleblower complaint | How the White House and Justice Department learned about the CIA officer

A brief timeline of how the intelligence community handled the whistleblower’s complaint

September 27, 2019 05:27 pm | Updated December 03, 2021 08:04 am IST - WASHINGTON

Joseph Maguire, acting director of national intelligence, testifies during a House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, on Capitol Hill in Washington.

Joseph Maguire, acting director of national intelligence, testifies during a House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, on Capitol Hill in Washington.

The White House and the Justice Department learned about a CIA officer’s concerns about President Donald Trump around the same time the individual filed a whistleblower complaint that is now at the center of an impeachment inquiry , according to a U.S. official and another person familiar with the matter.

The intelligence official initially filed a complaint about Mr. Trump’s dealings with Ukraine with the CIA, which then alerted the White House and Justice. On Aug. 12, the intelligence official raised another flag, this time with the intelligence community’s inspector general, a process that granted the individual more legal protections.

During that time, the inspector general’s complaint, which centered on Mr. Trump’s dealings with Ukraine, remained private. But information about the whistleblower was already making its way through the administration - on Aug. 14, White House counsel John Eisenberg and a CIA official alerted the head of DOJ’s national security division about the original complaint to the CIA.

Also read: Whistleblower on Trump-Ukraine contacts is a CIA officer, says sources

John Demers, who leads the national security division, went to the White House the next day to review materials associated with the call. He then alerted people within the Justice Department, but it was unclear specifically who he told.

In the following weeks, Mr. Demers had discussions with other Justice Department officials about how to handle the CIA complaint, according to the person familiar with the matter. It was during that period that the Justice Department also received a notification from the intelligence community’s inspector general about a whistleblower complaint.

 

The timeline raises questions about how the White House and the Justice Department handled the complaint. The administration initially blocked Congress from viewing the complaint, citing presidential privilege, and only released a redacted version of the report to lawmakers this week after the impeachment inquiry had begun.

The House intelligence committee released the complaint on September 26. The nine-page letter details a July 25 phone call in which Mr. Trump presses Ukraine’s leader to help investigate baseless corruption accusations against Democratic rival Joe Biden. The complaint also alleges that the White House sought to “lock down” details of the call by moving it onto a secure, classified computer system.

Editorial | Trump & impeachment: On foreign meddling in U.S. polls

The complaint also details extensive interactions between Rudy Giuliani, Mr. Trump’s personal attorney, and Ukrainian officials.

The person familiar with the matter, as well as another person with knowledge of the case, confirmed that the whistleblower was a CIA officer. The New York Times first reported that the individual was a CIA officer.

The U.S. official and the two people familiar with the matter spoke to AP on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

Also read: U.S. House backs release of Trump whistleblower complaint 421-0

The whistleblower’s attorney, Mark Zaid, said publishing details about the individual places the person in a dangerous situation, personally and professionally. The CIA referred questions to the inspector general.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.