US Supreme Court upholds Obamacare

It marked the second time in three years that the court ruled against a major challenge to the law brought by conservatives seeking to gut it.

June 25, 2015 08:21 pm | Updated July 12, 2016 07:07 am IST - WASHINGTON

The U.S. court on Thursday ruled on a 6-3 vote that the 2010 Affordable Care Act, widely known as Obamacare, did not restrict the subsidies to States that establish their own online healthcare exchanges. File photo

The U.S. court on Thursday ruled on a 6-3 vote that the 2010 Affordable Care Act, widely known as Obamacare, did not restrict the subsidies to States that establish their own online healthcare exchanges. File photo

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the nationwide availability of tax subsidies that are crucial to the implementation of President Barack Obama’s signature healthcare law, handing a major victory to the President.

The court ruled on a 6-3 vote that the 2010 Affordable Care Act, widely known as Obamacare, did not restrict the subsidies to States that establish their own online healthcare exchanges. It marked the second time in three years that the high court ruled against a major challenge to the law brought by conservatives seeking to gut it.

Chief Justice John Roberts was joined by fellow conservative Justice Anthony Kennedy and the court’s liberal members in the majority.

The decision means the subsidies will remain not just in the 13 States that have set up their own exchanges and the three States that have state-federal hybrid exchanges, but also in the 34 States that use the exchange run by the federal government.

The case centred on the tax subsidies offered under the law, passed by Mr. Obama’s fellow Democrats in Congress in 2010 over unified Republican opposition, that help low- and moderate-income people buy private health insurance. The exchanges are online marketplaces that allow consumers to shop among competing insurance plans.

The question before the justices was whether a four-word phrase in the expansive law saying subsidies are available to those buying insurance on exchanges “established by the state” has been correctly interpreted by the administration to allow subsidies to be available nationwide

Justice Roberts wrote that although the conservative challengers’ arguments about the plain meaning of the statute were “strong”, the “context and structure of the act compel us to depart from what would otherwise be the most natural reading of the pertinent statutory phrase”.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.