Theresa May loses key Brexit vote in British parliament

Lawmakers vote in favour of an amendment to grant MPs a vote on any Brexit deal signed with Brussels.

December 14, 2017 01:06 am | Updated 01:29 am IST - London

A packed House of Commons meets to vote on an amendment to the government’s E.U. (Withdrawal) Bill on December 13, 2017.

A packed House of Commons meets to vote on an amendment to the government’s E.U. (Withdrawal) Bill on December 13, 2017.

British Prime Minister Theresa May on December 13 suffered a damaging parliamentary defeat over Brexit, after her own MPs rebelled to demand parliament have the final say on the divorce deal with Brussels.

Members of Ms. May’s Conservative party joined with opposition lawmakers to inflict the government’s first defeat over the flagship E.U. (Withdrawal) Bill, sparking huge cheers in the House of Commons.

Ministers had sought to buy off the rebels with a last-minute promise of a parliamentary vote on the separation agreement, but their leader, former attorney general Dominic Grieve, warned: “It’s too late.” His amendment demanding a statutory vote on the deal before Britain leaves the E.U. in March 2019 passed by 309 votes to 305.

The Brexit Ministry said it was “disappointed”.

“We will now determine whether further changes are needed to the bill to ensure it fulfils its vital purpose,” the Ministry said in a statement.

It is a blow to Ms. May on the eve of a crucial summit in Brussels, where E.U. leaders are expected to approve the terms of the interim Brexit deal agreed last week after months of tortuous negotiations.

Gina Miller, a leading pro-E.U. campaigner, reacted saying: “Parliamentary sovereignty wins the day!”

But Nigel Farage, a key driving force behind the Brexit campaign, said: “My contempt for career politicians knows no bounds”.

Hampering ‘smooth’ Brexit

The E.U. (Withdrawal) Bill is intended to formally end Britain’s membership of the E.U., as well as smooth its exit by transferring thousands of pieces of European legislation onto the U.K. statute books. It also gives Ministers powers to amend the laws as they move across, to address any technical glitches.

But MPs objected to the fact that these so-called “Henry VIII” powers also extend to the implementation of the withdrawal agreement with the E.U.

Tory MP Iain Duncan Smith, a hardline Brexiteer, had accused Mr. Grieve of “looking for ways to derail the bill”, saying his amendment would “tie the government’s hands” in negotiations with the E.U.

But one Conservative MP, Antoinette Sandbach, had warned: “The government is presiding over a monumental task of immense importance for the future of this country.

“With any such change it is imperative that parliament maintains close scrutiny and oversight of the process.”

In a written statement to parliament earlier on December 13, Brexit Secretary David Davis promised that no withdrawal agreement would be implemented until a vote in both Houses of Parliament.

Parliament would then be asked to approve a further piece of legislation to implement the deal.

But Ministers wanted to preserve their special powers in the event that this law is not passed in time.

“That could be at a very late stage in the proceedings, which could mean that we are not able to have the orderly and smooth exit from the European Union that we wish to have,” Ms. May told MPs earlier.

The defeat spells further domestic trouble ahead for Ms. May, as parliament and her party are divided about Britain’s future relationship with the E.U.

Ahead of the December 13 vote, Mr. Grieve warned that Ministers were asking for “a blank cheque to the government to achieve something that, at the moment, we don’t know what it is”.

 

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.