Lakhvi’s lawyer opts out of Mumbai attacks case

The exit of the defence lawyers could slow down the pace of the trial in thecase relating to the attacks on India’s financial hub that killed 166 people in November 2008.

November 23, 2013 08:24 pm | Updated May 26, 2016 09:13 am IST - Islamabad

The defence lawyer for Lashkar-e-Taiba commander Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi who is suspected to have masterminded the Mumbai terror attacks, will no longer represent him in the ongoing case in Pakistan citing personal reasons.

Lawyer Riaz Akram Cheema told The Hindu on Sunday that he had taken a decision that from Saturday he was no longer concerned with the case and did not wish to continue defending Lakhvi and two other accused in the matter. He said he had personal reasons, mainly his mother who was suffering from blood cancer and that he wished to devote more time to her care. Mr. Cheema has been the defence lawyer right from 2009 when the case was filed but has not been appearing since the last few times. He had earlier assisted defence lawyers Khwaja Sultan Ahmed and later Khwaja Harris Ahmed who has also stopped appearing for the case four months ago. Mr. Cheema’s assistant Fakr Hayat Awan was asked to discontinue after the Pakistan Judicial Commission returned from India in September after its second visit to Mumbai.

His other two clients were Shahid Jamir Riaz and Mohammed Yunus Anjum who are among the seven accused lodged in jail. He also represented them in India during the two visits of the Commission. Mr. Cheema had demanded access to Ajmal Kasab, the lone surviving terrorist of the Mumbai attacks during the first visit of the judicial commission in 2011 but was denied permission. He said that the Commission had demanded that Kasab be produced in court so he could be cross examined on his confession statement but that was disallowed by the chief metropolitan magistrate in Mumbai. He said under Pakistan law unless the person who gave the confession statement is permitted to be cross examined it cannot serve as evidence. “We had a right to cross examine which was denied. Once Kasab was executed the case ended,” he added.

In addition he said even in Pakistan the evidence that was produced was not substantive and some of the witnesses had no real knowledge of what they claimed to know. There was no evidence regarding the control room from which allegedly the handlers and the masterminds operated and from the call records sent from India, there were no calls made to Kasab or by him to Pakistan.

The special public prosecutor in the Mumbai attacks case, Chaudhry Muhammed Azhar confirmed to The Hindu that the defence lawyers had stopped appearing since a few hearings. Now the accused were represented by Rizwan Abbasi who conducted the cross examination of two witnesses last week.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.