Sri Lanka: UN rights chief’s language went too far

Updated - November 17, 2021 02:10 am IST

Published - November 08, 2014 06:59 pm IST - COLOMBO

Sri Lanka on Saturday accused the U.N. human rights chief of using “intemperate language” to vilify a member state when he said the island nation was attacking the integrity of the world body’s investigation into alleged wartime abuses.

In a letter on Saturday to Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, Sri Lanka’s permanent United Nations representative, Ravinatha Aryasinha, also said double standards were being applied against Sri Lanka.

Mr. Aryasinha’s letter followed a statement by Mr. Hussein on Friday accusing Sri Lanka of carrying out a distortion and disinformation campaign against the U.N. investigation and of attempting to prevent witnesses from submitting evidence.

“It is a matter of deep concern to note that you, as a high official of the U.N. system, have resorted to the use of intemperate language to attack and vilify a sovereign member of the United Nations. Further, you have chosen to cast aspersions and denigrate a democratically elected government,” Mr. Aryasinha wrote.

The U.N. human rights body is investigating alleged abuses committed during the final phase of Sri Lanka’s 25-year civil war, which ended in 2009 when government troops defeated the Tamil Tiger rebels.

Sri Lanka has rejected the investigation and refused to allow investigators into the country. Mr. Hussein said in his statement that the government’s refusal to participate in the investigation raised concerns about its integrity, questioning why a government with nothing to hide would be uncooperative.

Mr. Aryasinha, however, said that his country’s refusal to participate was not tantamount to concealing information. “The government of Sri Lanka has steadfastly maintained that it owes to the country’s dignity not to subject its people to an investigation that does not conform to even the minimum requisites of justice and fair play,” he said.

An earlier U.N. report said up to 40,000 ethnic Tamil civilians may have been killed in the last months of the civil war, and accused both sides of serious human rights violations. It said the government was suspected of deliberately shelling civilians and hospitals and blocking food and medicine for civilians trapped in the war zone. The rebels were accused of recruiting child soldiers and holding civilians as human shields and firing from among them.

After resisting calls for an internal investigation for years since the war’s end, the government appointed a three-member commission to inquire into cases of war disappearances. It recently added three foreign advisers to increase the panel’s credibility.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.