Pakistan views Afghan Taliban as reliable anti-India element in Afghanistan: U.S. Congressional report

“India’s diplomatic and commercial presence in Afghanistan — and U.S. rhetorical support for it — exacerbates Pakistani fears of encirclement,” the U.S. Congressional report said.

November 06, 2019 08:07 pm | Updated 08:10 pm IST - Washington

Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan. File

Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan. File

Pakistan considers Afghan Taliban as a “relatively friendly” and “reliable anti-India element” in Afghanistan as it fears a strategic encirclement by New Delhi whose interest in the war-torn country stems largely from its broader regional rivalry with Islamabad, a U.S. Congressional report has said.

In its latest report on Afghanistan, the independent and bipartisan Congressional Research Service (CRS) identified Pakistan as the most important neighbour of Afghanistan.

However, it said Pakistan wanted a weak government in Kabul and has played an active, and by many accounts, a negative role in Afghan affairs for decades.

“Pakistan’s security establishment, fearful of a strategic encirclement by India, apparently continues to view the Afghan Taliban as a relatively friendly and reliable anti-India element in Afghanistan,” the CRS said.

“India’s diplomatic and commercial presence in Afghanistan — and U.S. rhetorical support for it — exacerbates Pakistani fears of encirclement. Indian interest in Afghanistan stems largely from India’s broader regional rivalry with Pakistan, which impedes Indian efforts to establish stronger and more direct commercial and political relations with central Asia,” it said in its latest report on Afghanistan.

 

Pakistan’s security services maintain ties to Afghan insurgent groups, most notably to the Haqqani Network, a U.S.-designated Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) that has become an official, semiautonomous component of the Taliban, the CRS said.

It periodically prepares reports on issues of importance for Congressmen for them to make informed decisions.

Afghan leaders, along with U.S. military commanders, attribute much of the insurgency’s power and longevity either directly or indirectly to Pakistani support, the report said, adding that U.S. President Donald Trump has accused Pakistan of “housing the very terrorists that we are fighting”.

U.S. officials have long identified militant safe havens in Pakistan as a threat to Afghanistan’s security, though some Pakistani officials dispute the charge, it said

“Pakistan may view a weak and destabilised Afghanistan as preferable to a strong, unified Afghan state [particularly one led by an ethnic Pashtun-dominated government in Kabul; Pakistan has a large and restive Pashtun minority],” the report said.

However, instability in Afghanistan could rebound to Pakistan’s detriment; Pakistan has struggled with indigenous Islamist militants of its own, the report added.

Afghanistan-Pakistan relations are further complicated by the presence of over a million Afghan refugees in Pakistan, as well as a long-running and ethnically tinged dispute over their shared 1,600-mile border, it said.

Insurgent and terrorist groups have demonstrated considerable capabilities in 2019, throwing into sharp relief the daunting security challenges that the Afghan government and its U.S. and international partners face.

At the same time, prospects for a negotiated settlement, driven by direct U.S.-Taliban talks, are uncertain in light of the September 2019 cancellation of those negotiations and the Taliban’s continued refusal to talk to the Afghan government, the report said.

The CRS warned that a potential collapse of the Afghan military and/or the government that commands it could have significant implications for the United States, particularly given the nature of negotiated security arrangements.

Regardless of how likely the Taliban would be to gain full control over all or even most of the country, the breakdown of social order and the fracturing of the country into fiefdoms controlled by paramilitary commanders and their respective militias may be plausible, even probable, the report added.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.