Imran Khan sentenced in cipher case to appease a foreign power: Lawyer

Former Pakistan PM Imran Khan and former Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi were handed down a sentence of 10 years each in the cipher case in January for publishing contents of a secret cable sent by the country's ambassador in Washington to the government in Islamabad.

March 29, 2024 04:38 pm | Updated 04:38 pm IST - Islamabad

A file photo of Pakistan’s former Prime Minister Imran Khan

A file photo of Pakistan’s former Prime Minister Imran Khan | Photo Credit: Reuters

Jailed former prime minister Imran Khan’s lawyer, while pointing out loopholes in a trial court’s verdict in the diplomatic cipher case, has said that the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf founder and former Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi were sentenced in the case simply to appease a foreign power.

The Express Tribune on March 29 reported that it emerged during the hearing of appeals by the PTI leaders by a division bench of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) on March 28.

Also read: Imran Khan | The cornered captain

The bench, comprising Justice Aamer Farooq and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, resumed hearing the appeals of the PTI leaders against their conviction under the Official Secrets Act, 1923, for misusing a diplomatic cipher to the detriment of national interests.

Just two weeks before the ouster of the PTI government in April 2022 through a vote of no-confidence, Khan had brandished a piece of paper—allegedly a copy of a diplomatic cipher—at a public rally in Islamabad, claiming it as proof of a conspiracy against his government by a foreign power.

During the last Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz-led government, the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) registered a case against Khan and Qureshi for misusing the cipher copy.

The ex-prime minister, along with Qureshi, was handed down a sentence of 10 years each in the cipher case in January for publishing contents of a secret cable sent by the country's ambassador in Washington to the government in Islamabad.

On Thursday, when Justice Farooq asked Salman Safdar, the lawyer of 71-year-old Khan and 67-year-old Qureshi, about what the former premier had waved in a public rally in March 2022, the lawyer said it was the job of the prosecution—the FIA—to establish what was in Khan’s hand during that rally.

Continuing his arguments, Mr. Safdar said Pakistan’s former ambassador to the US, Asad Majeed, had dispatched the cipher after a meeting with US diplomat Donald Lu. “In his testimony before the trial court, he did not disclose what prompted him to send the cipher telegram after that meeting. However, he clarified that he never mentioned any conspiracy in his message,” Mr. Safdar said.

When Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb asked Mr. Safdar if Mr. Majeed was one of the prosecution witnesses who were aware of the content of the cipher, the lawyer replied in the affirmative. He said Mr. Majeed had recommended in a National Security Committee (NSC) meeting to issue a strong demarche on Donald Lu's statement, adding that the former PM had not violated his oath by revealing the threat issued by Mr. Lu.

Mr. Safdar said the trial court neither summoned the former US charge d’affaires, Angela Aggeler nor asked for the record of her WhatsApp conversations with another Pakistani official. “A former PM has been put behind bars on the instruction of former US charge d’affaires and Lu,” he said.

Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb asked if a PM could be imprisoned, say just for laying stress on completing the Iran-Pakistan Gas Pipeline project. “At least you will need an FIR to do that,” he added. The court noted that Asad Majeed could be the prosecution’s star witness. However, he did not reveal anything to qualify to become such a witness. The court later adjourned till Tuesday, the report said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.