China ups pressure as Huawei CFO’s hearing goes into Tuesday

Meng Wanzhou was detained at the request of the U.S. during a layover at the Vancouver airport December 1.

December 11, 2018 07:45 am | Updated December 03, 2021 10:08 am IST - Vancouver (Canada)

In this courtroom sketch by Jane Wolsak and released by AFP, Meng Wanzhou (left), Huawei Chief Financial Officer, speaks with lawyer David Martin in the courtroom in Vancouver, British Columbia.

In this courtroom sketch by Jane Wolsak and released by AFP, Meng Wanzhou (left), Huawei Chief Financial Officer, speaks with lawyer David Martin in the courtroom in Vancouver, British Columbia.

The Huawei Chief Financial Officer will have to wait at least more day to see if she will be released on bail in a case that has raised U.S.-China tensions and complicated efforts to resolve a trade dispute that has roiled financial markets and threatened global economic growth.

Meng Wanzhou was detained at the request of the U.S. during a layover at the Vancouver airport December 1 — the same day that Presidents Donald Trump and Xi Jinping of China agreed to a 90-day cease-fire in the trade dispute that threatens to disrupt global commerce.

The U.S. has accused Huawei of using a Hong Kong shell company to sell equipment to Iran in violation of U.S. sanctions. It also says Ms. Meng and Huawei misled banks about the company’s business dealings in Iran.

Bail hearing continues on Tuesday

After a second day long session, Justice William Ehrcke said the bail hearing would continue on Tuesday. In urging the court to reject Ms. Meng’s bail request, prosecutor John Gibb-Carsley noted the Huawei executive has vast resources and a strong incentive to flee as she is facing fraud charges in the United States that could put her in prison for 30 years.

Gibb-Carsley later told the judge that if he does decide to grant bail it should include house arrest. David Martin, Ms. Meng’s lawyer, said Ms. Meng was willing to pay for a surveillance company to monitor her and wear an ankle monitor but she wanted to be able to travel around Vancouver and its suburbs.

Scott Filer of Lions Gate Risk Management group said his company would make a citizen’s arrest if she breached bail conditions.

Martin said Meng’s husband would put up both of their Vancouver homes plus $1 million Canadian ($750,000) for a total value of $15 million Canadian ($ 11.2 million) as collateral.

The judge cast doubt on that proposal, saying Ms. Meng’s husband isn’t a resident of British Columbia — a requirement for him to act as a guarantor that his wife won’t flee — and his visitor visa expires in February.

No meaningful connections

The prosecutor said her husband has no meaningful connections to Vancouver and spends only two or three weeks a year in the city.

Gibb-Carsley also expressed concern about the idea of using a security company paid by Ms. Meng. He said later that $15 million Canadian ($11.2 million) would be an appropriate amount if the judge granted bail, but he said half should be in cash.

Ms. Meng’s arrest has fueled U.S.-China trade tensions at a time when the two countries are seeking to resolve a dispute over Beijing’s technology and industrial strategy.

Both sides have sought to keep the issues separate, at least so far, but the arrest has roiled markets, with stock markets worldwide down again Monday.

The hearing has sparked widespread interest, and the courtroom was packed again Monday with media and spectators, including some who came to support Ms. Meng.

Summoning of Canadian Ambassador

One man in the gallery brought binoculars to have a closer look at Ms. Meng, while outside court a man and woman held a sign that read “Free Ms. Meng.”

Over the weekend, Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Le Yucheng summoned Canadian Ambassador John McCallum and U.S. Ambassador Terry Branstad.

Mr. Le warned both countries that Beijing would take steps based on their response. Asked Monday what those steps might be, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang said only, “It totally depends on the Canadian side itself.”

The Canadian province of British Columbia has already cancelled a trade mission to China amid fears China could detain Canadians in retaliation for Meng’s detention.

Stocks around the world fell on Monday over investor concerns about the continuing US-China trade dispute, as well as the cloud hanging over Brexit negotiations after Britain’s prime minister postponed a vote on her deal for Britain to quit the European Union. In the U.S., stocks were volatile, tumbling in the morning and then recovering in the afternoon.

US-China trade disputes

The Huawei case complicates efforts to resolve the U.S.-China trade dispute. The United States has slapped tariffs on $250 billion in Chinese imports, charging that China steals American technology and forces U.S. companies to turn over trade secrets.

Tariffs on $200 billion of those imports were scheduled to rise from 10 per cent to 25 per cent on January 1. But over dinner December 1 with Mr. Xi in Buenos Aires, Argentina, Trump agreed to delay the increase for 90 days, buying time for more negotiations.

Bill Perry, a trade lawyer with Harris Bricken in Seattle, said China’s decelerating economy is putting pressure on Mr. Xi to make concessions before U.S. tariffs go up.

“They need a trade deal. They don’t want the tariffs to go up to 25” per cent, said Perry, who produces the “US China Trade War” blog.

“This is Damocles’ sword hanging over the Chinese government.” Huawei, the biggest global supplier of network gear for phone and internet companies, has become the target of U.S. security concerns because of its ties to the Chinese government.

The U.S. has pressured other countries to limit use of its technology, warning they could be opening themselves up to surveillance and theft of information.

Lu, the Foreign Ministry spokesman, accused countries he didn’t cite by name of hyping the “so-called” threat. “I must tell you that not a single piece of evidence have they ever presented to back their allegation,” he said.

“To create obstacles for companies’ normal operations based on speculation is quite absurd.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.