Beijing names six places in Arunachal in Chinese characters

The move comes within days of the Dalai Lama’s visit to the State.

Updated - November 29, 2021 01:22 pm IST

Published - April 19, 2017 12:48 pm IST - BEIJING:

Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama greets devotees at the Buddha Park in Bomdila, Arunachal Pradesh. File

Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama greets devotees at the Buddha Park in Bomdila, Arunachal Pradesh. File

Within days of the Dalai Lama’s visit, China has reinforced its claims to Arunachal Pradesh by naming six places in the state in standardised Chinese characters, Tibetan and Roman alphabet letters.

On April 14, China's Ministry of Civil Affairs announced on its website that the State Council — China’s cabinet had issued the new regulations.

The state-run Global Times reported that the name the six places in South Tibet — the name ascribed by Beijing to Arunachal Pradesh- are: Wo'gyainling, Mila Ri, Qoidêngarbo Ri, Mainquka, Bümo La and Namkapub Ri.

In response to a question,  foreign ministry spokesperson Lu Kang asserted on Wednesday that  the standardization of names was a "legitimate action by the Chinese government,” in tune “with our regulations”. He stressed that China’s position on the eastern section of our boundary is “consistent and clear”.


Mr. Lu underscored that China was “firmly against” the “Indian government’s indulgence of Dalai Lama activities in disputed eastern section of the India China boundary and also about his anti-China activities.” He added: “These activities are also against the Indian government’s commitments to China.”

The Global Times quoted Xiong Kunxin, a professor of ethnic studies at Beijing's Minzu University of China, as saying that, "The standardisation (of  names) came amid China's growing understanding and recognition of the geography in South Tibet. Naming the places is a step to reaffirm China's territorial sovereignty to South Tibet."

In a conversation with The Hindu , Liu Zongyi, senior fellow of Shanghai Institutes for International Studies said that, “The back-and-forth cycle related to the Dalai Lama’s visit is clearly not over yet. I suspect that we have not achieved the closure to this episode.”

The latest move by China follow a string of warnings issued by the foreign ministry and state-media regarding the Dalai Lama’s visit. On April 5, China's foreign ministry slammed India by saying that the Dalai Lama’s visit had “severely damaged” Sino-Indian ties.


The ministry also asserted that the Tibetan leader’s visit to the State “will escalate the dispute in border areas.”

There were also references in the Chinese state-media that by green-lighting the visit, India was questioning Beijing’s “one china policy,” the core of the country’s statehood. An editorial in the state-run China Daily had earlier taken exception to  remarks by the Minister of State for home affairs, Kiren Rijiju that, "China should not object to the Dalai Lama's visit and interfere in India's internal affairs."

“(Mr.) Rijiju might think himself cute in borrowing a line from Beijing's diplomatic representations, but he has ignored the fundamental distinction here: Like Taiwan and any other part of China, Tibet is a part of Chinese territory no matter whether New Delhi agrees or not.”

In an interview with Reuters, Pema Khandu, Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh was quoted as saying that ,“As far as the boundary issue is concerned, I have also maintained that we don’t share our boundary with China, but we share our boundary with Tibet”. Analysts say that the statement was interpreted as questioning the “One-China” principle.


But in New Delhi, the foreign ministry spokesperson made it “absolutely clear that there is no change whatsoever in the Government of India’s policy towards the Tibet Autonomous Region of the People’s Republic of China.” “Similarly, our approach to seeking a fair, reasonable and mutually acceptable solution to the boundary question remains unchanged.

The Global Times quoted Guo Kefan, a research fellow at the Tibet Academy of Social Sciences, that, “Standardising the names from the angles of culture and geography could serve as a reference or leverage when China and India negotiate border issues in future.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.