U.S. rules out mediation between Afghanistan, Pakistan

The U.S., he said, wants Afghanistan and Pakistan to work through these differences bilaterally, which they can do because they have done it in the past.

June 17, 2016 02:00 pm | Updated December 04, 2021 11:12 pm IST - Washington

John Kirby. file photo.

John Kirby. file photo.

The U.S. has ruled out mediation between Afghanistan and Pakistan, and asked the two countries to work together to deescalate tensions at the Torkham border crossing where deadly clashes have killed a Pakistani major and two Afghan border guards and wounded 20 on both sides.

“We are obviously very concerned by the border clashes, particularly around the Torkham crossing. We want both sides to ratchet down the violence and begin a dialogue to try to reduce the tensions, keep the crossing open, and have it done peaceably,” the State Department Spokesman, John Kirby told reporters at his daily news conference.

Underlining that the U.S. believes that the right approach is an Afghan-led reconciliation process, he said, “We continue to support [Afghan] President [Ashraf] Ghani as he continues to try to get that process back on track. Now what effect the border clashes are having on reconciliation, I don’t know.”

“I haven’t seen any practical effect of it to date. These clashes have only just popped up in recent days. But that aside, we still want to see the reconciliation process move forward,” Mr. Kirby said as he ruled out the U.S. jumping in as a mediator between the two countries.

“We have not taken a mediation role, and we have talked about this before. This is an Afghan-led process. We obviously support it and we want to see it succeed. We have expressed that support privately and publicly.

But this is President Ghani’s initiative; he’s taking it on. We know he wants to get it back on track and we fully support him in that effort, but this is not for the United States mediating between Afghanistan and Pakistan,” he said.

The U.S., he said, wants Afghanistan and Pakistan to work through these differences bilaterally, which they can do because they have done it in the past.

“This isn’t the first time that we have seen clashes even at that crossing, and they have been able to work through it in the past and we are absolutely confident that, with moral courage on both sides, they can continue to work through it,” he said.

Observing that the U.S. does not want to see this kind of violence between the two sides, Mr. Kirby said there are plenty of shared threats and common challenges between Afghanistan and Pakistan and plenty of reasons for them to look for ways to work together.

“They have made some progress in terms of cooperation across that border and communication and in counterterrorism efforts,” he said.

“So nobody likes to see the clashes and the violence that we have seen to date, but it’s too soon to say, well, just because there’s been some of this, that the whole reconciliation process should be just thrown out the window, or that the differences between Afghanistan and Pakistan are irreconcilable and therefore not worth continuing to pursue dialogue and cooperation. We are just not there yet,” Mr. Kirby said.

Torkham, a usually busy crossing, has remained closed because of continuing tensions.

Pakistan alleged that “unprovoked” firing was started by Afghanistan’s security forces when construction work began on a new gate on the Pakistani side.

Last month, the border crossing was sealed for several days over the construction of the gate, causing hardships to thousands of people who cross it every day.

Afghan government does not recognise the border, which is also known as Durand Line, and it opposes permanent structure.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.