A look at Chelsea Manning’s case

She said she leaked the material to expose U.S military’s “bloodlust” and disregard for human life.

January 18, 2017 11:11 am | Updated 12:53 pm IST

Chelsea Elizabeth Manning seen as Bradley Edward Manning in this handout photo.

Chelsea Elizabeth Manning seen as Bradley Edward Manning in this handout photo.

U.S. Army Private Chelsea Manning’s 35-year sentence for leaking classified information to the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks has been commuted by President Barack Obama to about seven years, including the time she spent locked up before she was convicted in 2013 and her sentence is now set to expire on May 17.

What was she convicted of?

A judge convicted Chelsea Manning, then known as Bradley Edward Manning, on July 30, 2013, of 20 counts, including six Espionage Act violations, theft and computer fraud.

She was sentenced to 35 years out of a possible maximum of 90. She was acquitted of the most serious charge of aiding the enemy, which carries a possible life sentence.

What did she do?

The now 29-year-old native of Crescent, Okla., leaked more than 7,00,000 classified Iraq and Afghanistan war logs and diplomatic cables in 2010 while working as an intelligence analyst in Baghdad.

Chelsea Manning also leaked a 2007 video clip of a U.S. helicopter crew killing at least nine men, including a Reuters news photographer and his driver. The Pentagon concluded the troops acted appropriately, having mistaken the camera equipment for weapons.

Prosecutors’ evidence

Government witnesses testified the leaks endangered people who were named as information sources, prompting the State Department to help some of them move, even to other countries, for their safety. Several ambassadors were recalled, expelled or reassigned because of embarrassing disclosures.

Prosecutors showed that the al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula used material from the Apache helicopter attack in a propaganda video. Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden obtained and presumably read some of the leaked documents, the evidence showed.

Defence’s main arguments

The defense produced evidence that the Army disregarded Manning’s emotional turmoil over her gender identity and isolation in a military that barred homosexuals from serving openly.

The day after she was sentenced, Manning announced in a statement that she was a woman named Chelsea and demanded hormone therapy, which the Army eventually approved.

Why did she do it?

Manning said she leaked the material to expose the U.S military’s “bloodlust” and disregard for human life, and what she considered American diplomatic duplicity.

She said she chose information she believed would not harm the U.S. After her conviction, she apologised for unintentionally causing harm, but not for revealing U.S. secrets.

Status of any appeal

Manning’s lawyers filed an appeal of the court-martial findings in May to the Army Court of Criminal Appeals. Court Clerk Malcom H. Squires Jr. said on Tuesday he didn’t know how the commutation of Manning’s sentence could affect the appeals process. Further appeals can be made to the military’s highest court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and the U.S. Supreme Court.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.