In an interesting twist to arguments in the 2002 hit-and-run case involving Bollywood superstar Salman Khan, his lawyer argued in the Bombay High Court on Saturday that the victim died not because of the actor’s car running over him, but as the vehicle came crashing down on him when it was being lifted by a crane.
Justice A. R. Joshi is hearing an appeal filed by Salman against the five-year jail term awarded to him on May 6 by a sessions court which found him guilty of ramming his car into a shop on September 28, 2002, killing one person and injuring four others who were sleeping outside.
Salman’s lawyer Amit Desai alleged that the victim of the accident Narullah Mehboob Sharif died when the bumper detached after the car was being lifted by a crane. However, the trial court had not considered this.
“It was not a frontal hit...the left side has scratched the shutter. Thereafter, to help out those who were lying underneath the car, a crane was brought according to the evidence given by prosecution witness 26 police inspector Rajendra Kadam”, the lawyer argued.
Prosecution witness 11 has told the trial court that until the car was lifted, he was crying for help and so was Narullah. “This proves that Narullah was alive after the mishap and it also proves that it was not a frontal hit as the bumper was intact....thereafter, the rescue operation started and the crane was called”, he said.
To demonstrate his argument, Salman’s lawyer showed the court the bumper of the car which was placed as a piece of evidence. He pointed out that the bumper was damaged on the right side.
“Had it been a frontal hit, the bumper would have been completely damaged,” he said.
