No anticipatory bail for man accused of sand mining

May 27, 2018 12:06 am | Updated 12:06 am IST - Mumbai

THANJAVUR, TAMIL NADU, 13/09/2017: Sand mining along the Kollidam (Coleroon) riverbed at locations spanning Koviladi in Thanjavur district where large-scale sand-mining has been permitted. 
Photo: M. Moorthy

THANJAVUR, TAMIL NADU, 13/09/2017: Sand mining along the Kollidam (Coleroon) riverbed at locations spanning Koviladi in Thanjavur district where large-scale sand-mining has been permitted. Photo: M. Moorthy

The Bombay High Court has rejected the anticipatory bail of a man accused of sand mining in Dive creek.

Following a tip-off on December 29 last year, Tehsildar Mukesh Patil sent government officials to Dive creek where a group of 14 people was illegally mining sand using suction pumps. The officials sealed the machinery and apprehended the offenders, who claimed to be working at the behest of Wasim Khan, Kailas Patil and Onkar Patil.

Mr. Khan said that Mr. Kailas Patil and two others paid him ₹600 per brass to extract sand from the creek. An FIR was lodged against Mr. Patil under Section 379 (punishment for theft) and Section 439 (punishment for intentionally running vessel aground or ashore with intent to commit theft) of the Indian Penal Code, and relevant sections of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, Environmental Protection Act, Maharashtra Marine Board Act and Indian Vessels Act.

Rejecting anticipatory bail, a Single Bench of Justice A.S. Gadkari said, “It is to be noted here that the allegation against the accused is that they were indulging in illegal excavation of sand, i.e. government property. It is to be noted that for the purpose of investigation, the statement of the co-accused can be taken into consideration.”

The Bench said there was sufficient evidence to prove Mr. Kailas Patil’s complicity in the crime. Mr. Gadkari said, “After taking into consideration the serious allegations levelled against him and the gravity of the offence, this court is of the view that he does not deserve to be protected by pre-arrest bail.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.