HC dismisses plea challenging order of Wardha Collector

Official granted permission for a large gathering in district

November 30, 2020 11:31 pm | Updated 11:31 pm IST - Mumbai

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has dismissed a petition challenging an order by the District Collector of Wardha granting permission to hold a large gathering. The court warned the Collector to exercise caution and observed he had not realised his mistake as his previous order violated the government’s guidelines.

A Division Bench of Justices Sunil Shukre and Avinash Gharote was hearing a petition filed by Rajendra Sharma, a 60-year-old social worker. The Bench directed the Collector to ensure that not more than 50 people attend the gathering and keep a list of their names in his office “to avoid future complications”.

In a previous hearing, the court had noted that the Collector’s order granting permission to Serva Sewa Sangh to hold a gathering of 100 people was in violation of the State government’s orders dated September 30 and October 29, but he deserved to be granted liberty to introspect. However, the Collector simply revised the order and permitted a gathering of not more than 50 people.

‘Not clearly defined’

The court said the government’s orders did not define ‘large public gatherings’ and prescribed a limit on attendees only for gatherings related to marriages and funerals. “We do not think such a ceiling can be applied to a public gathering, so as to distinguish between a small and large one,” the court said.

The court added, “We are, therefore, of the view that what could be a small or large public gathering would have to be decided on the basis of facts and circumstances of each case and there cannot be any exhaustive illustration of all the facts and circumstances which could be considered as determinative factors. Such factors as the availability of space at the proposed venue, the capacity of the organisers to ensure compliance with the standard operating procedure, the ambience at the proposed venue, situation of the proposed venue, accessibility to the proposed venue, and so on and so forth.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.