Bombay High Court refuses interim relief to Maharashtra Minister Nawab Malik

The NCP leader is in jail in connection with a money laundering case of 1999 linking him to underworld don Dawood Ibrahim

March 15, 2022 12:48 pm | Updated 12:48 pm IST - Mumbai

NCP leader Nawab Malik  was arrested on February 24 after being questioned by the Enforcement Directorate for seven hours. File

NCP leader Nawab Malik  was arrested on February 24 after being questioned by the Enforcement Directorate for seven hours. File | Photo Credit: PTI

The Bombay High Court on Tuesday refused interim release to Maharashtra’s Cabinet Minister Nawab Malik in a money laundering case of 1999 linking him to underworld don Dawood Ibrahim.

Editorial | Active agent: On Nawab Malik arrest

A Division Bench of justices P.B. Varale and S.M. Modak said, “As certain debatable issues are raised, they require to be heard at length. Considering the grounds assigned by us we are not inclined to allow the interim application. Applications rejected.”

The court had reserved the order on March 11 after hearing the arguments in the habeas corpus petition filed by Mr. Malik for four consecutive days.

The case came to light after Munira Plumber, owner of a prime ancestral property in suburban Mumbai, alleged that her property which cost ₹ 300 crores was sold at ₹5 lakhs through Dawood’s sister Haseen Parker to Mr. Malik.

The five-time member of the legislative Assembly was arrested on February 24 after being questioned by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for seven hours, claiming Mr. Malik’s “active involvement in terror funding.”

The Nationalist Congress Party leader has been lodged at the Arthur Road Jail since March 7 for a case dating back to 1999. The ED has contended that Mr. Malik’s dealings in the case is sensitive involving proceeds of crime from organised sector that has international ramifications.

Senior advocate Amit Desai appearing for the Minister of Minority Affairs and Skill Development pointed out that the transaction relied by the central agency are of 1999, 2003 and 2005. He asked how Mr. Malik could be charged under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act when it was notified in 2005.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.