Bombay High Court dismisses Raj Kundra’s plea against arrest in pornography case

Businessman and his aide were held in July and are lodged at Arthur Road Jail

August 07, 2021 11:31 am | Updated 11:33 am IST - MUMBAI:

Raj Kundra

Raj Kundra

The Bombay High Court on Saturday dismissed the pleas filed by Raj Kundra and his aide Ryan Thorpe challenging their arrest and seeking immediate release from Arthur Road Jail over a pornographic racket busted this year.

A Single Bench of Justice A.S. Gadkari was hearing a petition filed by Mr. Kundra, businessman and husband of actor Shilpa Shetty. The court conducted a physical hearing.

Mr. Kundra and his aide were arrested on July 19 by the Property Cell of Mumbai Crime Branch. They challenged the magistrate’s order rejecting their bail applications on July 28. The magistrate court had held, “If released, they will hamper the investigation and the alleged offence is detrimental to the health of society.”

Chief Public Prosecutor Aruna Pai had previously argued that initially a notice was issued by the Mumbai police to Mr. Kundra under Section 41A (notice of appearance before police officer) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which he refused but Mr. Thorpe accepted.

Ms. Pai said Mr. Kundra was the admin of Hotshot (the app used to produce and circulate pornographic content). He refused to sign the notice and did not cooperate at all.

She added a lot of incriminating material was found against the accused and they were arrested because they had deleted messages from Whatsapp groups, thereby destroying evidence. Therefore, Section 201 (causing disappearance of evidence of offence, or giving false information to screen offender) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) was added.

She went on to say that in the office laptop there was a hard disk that had over 100 porn videos and Mr. Kundra’s laptop had a film script with sexual content.

Senior advocate Aabad Ponda, appearing for Mr. Kundra, contended his client was not issued a proper notice and was arrested in the garb of recording his statement.

The duo was booked under Sections 354 (assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty), 292 (sale, etc., of obscene books, etc.) of the IPC and relevant sections of the Information Technology Act and Indecent Representation of Women Act.

Mr. Kundra has filed for bail before the City Civil and Sessions Court, which will be heard on August 10.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.