Wunderbar wins suit against VIP copycat

HC restrains Marathi production house

July 02, 2018 01:06 am | Updated 01:06 am IST - CHENNAI

Actor Dhanush’s Wunderbar Films has won a civil suit preferred by it before the Madras High Court to restrain Mumbai-based Pranita Pawar Productions from releasing its Marathi film Mahaja Naav Shivaji (MNS), which the plaintiff claimed to be a copy of its blockbuster Tamil movie Velai Illa Pattathari (VIP), released in 2014.

Justice C.V. Karthikeyan decreed the suit, which also prayed for a direction to the production house to surrender to the plaintiff company the entire stock of software, digitised master copies, master cassettes, master HD/DVD/CDs, sound recordings, literature, pamphlets and all other materials related to its movie MNS . The judge further directed MNS’s producers Pranita Pawar and Chakraborty, who had acted in the lead role, to render true and faithful account of the profits earned by them from the movie and pay costs incurred by the plaintiff to file the present suit. He said Wunderbar Films had proved the suit claim by producing sufficient evidence. According to the plaintiff company, the promos, teasers, trailers, the storyline, scenes, write-ups and clips of songs available publicly on the Internet prove that MSV was nothing but a remake of VIP. “The storyline is the same. The songs are copies of the songs of VIP. Thus, the defendants have infringed the plaintiff’s copyrights,” it claimed.

Wunderbar Films pointed out that the hero of MNS was portrayed as a slender, ordinary looking youngster with a stubble beard similar to Dhanush’s role in VIP . Further, there were many similarities such as the hero using a moped, sitting on the terrace along with his mother looking through a telescope and pulling out a liquor bottle from the water tank while chiding his brother.

The tune of two popular songs of VIP beginning with the lyrics, “ Udhungada Sangu …” and “ What a Karuvad …” have been copied in MNS along with the group dance, the plaintiff claimed.

Pointing out that a legal notice issued by the plaintiff to Pranita Pawar was returned undelivered, Wunderbar said that it had nevertheless issued a public notice in local newspapers.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.