Vignesh died of custodial torture, says joint action committee of advocates 

The committee demands arrest of police personnel responsible for the man’s death

April 30, 2022 07:34 pm | Updated May 01, 2022 04:23 am IST - CHENNAI:

Picture used for representational purposes only. File

Picture used for representational purposes only. File | Photo Credit: The Hindu photo library

A joint action committee against custodial torture comprising advocates and social workers on Saturday released a fact-finding report on the custodial of death of Vignesh, 25, in a city police station recently and said that it was a clear case of death due to custodial torture. They demanded the arrest of police personnel responsible for his death.

The committee comprising senior advocate Sudha Ramalingam, advocate and director of People's Watch Henri Tiphagne, People's Watch state coordinator I. Aseervatham, advocates B.S. Ajeetha and Milton addressed the media on Saturday.   They asked the DGP CB-CID to announce the name of the investigation officer in the case immediately so that witnesses could approach him and share information.  

The fact-finding team said that on the night of April, 18, Vignesh and his friend Suresh were taken into custody in the late night at Kellys by the night-round police and tortured brutally using the police helmet. Vignesh died in police custody the next day and on the same day, the autopsy was done and the body cremated. They alleged that the guidelines issued by Madras High Court relating to custodial death were not followed and the kith and kin of the victim were denied the right to access the body or to take photographs even before the commencement of autopsy. 

While registering a first information report (FIR), the CB-CID should include Section 302 (Punishment for Murder) and provisions of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act since Vignesh and Suresh belonged to the Scheduled Caste, the Committee urged. 

The investigation officers of the CB-CID should arrest the personnel who were suspended, the inspector, the Assistant Commissioner and the Deputy Commissioner who were in charge that night and other officials who were allegedly responsible for the death. As per Witness Protection Scheme 2019, the Principal Sessions Judge should initiate proceedings and receive petitions from witnesses and adequate protection should be given to the witnesses, the committee said.  

They wanted to seize all CCTV footage from Ayanavaram, Foreshore Estate and Secretariat Colony police station limits that recorded the sequence of events on April 18, 19 and 20 and scrutinise them. They sought the Chief Justice of Madras High Court to take suo motu cognisance of the matter and to monitor the progress of investigation so as to prevent the recurrence of such custodial death hereafter.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.