High Court rejects Minister’s plea to gag NGO, media

Judge justifies move by pointing to material possessed by Arappor Iyakkam

June 04, 2019 01:41 am | Updated 07:31 am IST - CHENNAI

Municipal Administration Minister S.P. Velumani

Municipal Administration Minister S.P. Velumani

The Madras High Court on Monday dismissed petitions filed by Municipal Administration Minister S.P. Velumani and some government civil contractors to gag Arappor Iyakkam, a non-governmental organisation, and its managing trustee Jayaram Venkatesan from making allegations of corruption against them.

Justice R. Subramanian rejected the plea on the ground that the petitioners had neither made out any prima facie case for grant of an interim injunction sought by them nor the balance of convenience was in favour of them. On the other hand, the NGO was in possession of prima facie materials to substantiate the allegations, he said.

Stating that a pre-trial interim injunction could be issued only if the allegations appeared to be entirely false or that they had been made with a mala fide intention, the judge agreed with Arappor Iyakkam’s counsel V. Suresh that none of the two essential requirements had been satisfied in the present case as the NGO was in possession of substantial documents.

The lawyer also brought it to the notice of the court that it was only because of the sustained efforts of the NGO and its reports carried in newspapers that people in various localities had become aware of rules and regulations and began insisting on civil contractors in their localities to lay roads only after milling the existing tar.

The minister and the contractors had insisted on the gag order pending adjudication of civil suits preferred by them seeking damages to the tune of ₹1 crore for having defamed them.

The contractors specifically contended that they were not public servants and therefore the NGO could not be allowed to damage their reputation.

However, rejecting their contention, Justice Subramanian said, the contractors could not claim immunity from public scrutiny especially when they were executing civil works for the government and were paid from the public exchequer. He also dismissed another petition filed by the minister for a gag order against Tamil magazine Junior Vikatan represented by its counsel N. Ramesh.

Dismissing yet another petition filed by R. Chandrasekar, Editor of AIADMK’s mouthpiece Namadhu Amma, with a plea to restrain Tamil magazine Nakheeran from carrying articles damaging his reputation, the judge directed the magazine not to carry the photographs of his close relatives alone.

He recorded the submissions of advocate P.T. Perumal, representing Nakheeran, that the plaintiff was closely associated with politics with his wife having contested the Coimbatore municipal corporation elections and therefore all his activities were being closely watched by the media and the people.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.