HC orders mediation to resolve studio row

Ilaiyaraaja wanted trial on suit against his forcible eviction from studio expedited

December 04, 2019 01:20 am | Updated 01:20 am IST - CHENNAI

Ilaiyaraaja. File

Ilaiyaraaja. File

The Madras High Court on Tuesday referred to its mediation and conciliation centre a dispute between acclaimed film musician Ilaiyaraaja and Prasad Studios over vacating Recording Theatre Number -1, known popularly as Ilaiyaraaja recording theatre, due to him having occupied it for more than four decades.

Justice V. Bharathidasan directed both the musician as well as the proprietors of Prasad Digital Laboratories at Saligramam to appear before the mediation centre on the High Court campus on December 9 and ordered the mediators to submit a report before the court, on the outcome of the talks, by December 13.

The interim orders were passed after hearing arguments advanced by senior counsel AR.L. Sundaresan on a civil revision petition filed by Mr. Ilaiyaraaja, seeking a direction to the XVII Assistant City Civil Court in Chennai to expedite the hearing of a suit filed against his forcible eviction from the recording theatre.

In the petition, filed through his counsel on record A. Saravanan, the musician claimed to have been in continuous and lawful occupation of the recording theatre for more than 42 years. It was used for recording more than 6,000 songs for over 1,000 movies, and it was still in active use by the petitioner.

However, since the studio owners were now attempting to evict him in the guise of developing the property, he had filed a suit against forcible eviction before the city civil court and also impressed upon interim orders. The trial court had been keeping the case pending for long without passing any orders and hence the present revision.

Stating that he was in possession of documents to prove his occupation of the theatre for over four decades,the petitioner said the city civil court should have granted an interim injuntion in his favour and ensured speedy trial of the suit.

On finding that it was a dispute fit to be referred to the mediation and conciliation centre, the judge decided to give it a shot before attempting to decide the case on merits. Only if the issue could not be solved through mediation, the judge would pass appropriate orders on the revision petition after hearing both sides.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.