Court ‘arrests’ stranded ship

Vessel that ran aground cannot leave Chennai

Updated - November 17, 2021 04:13 am IST

Published - November 03, 2012 04:12 am IST - CHENNAI:

MT Pratibha Cauvery was in the outer anchorage of Chennai Port when the cyclone struck — Photo: V. Ganesan

MT Pratibha Cauvery was in the outer anchorage of Chennai Port when the cyclone struck — Photo: V. Ganesan

The Madras High Court on Friday restrained MT Pratibha Cauvery , the ship that ran aground off Elliots Beach on Wednesday, from leaving Chennai Port.

The court order would mean the ship is ‘arrested.’ Justice N. Paul Vasanthakumar passed the order on a petition seeking a direction to the Central and State governments to conduct a proper inquiry and take action against Pratibha Shipping Company Ltd., Mumbai.

It sought an injunction restraining the vessel from leaving Chennai pending disposal of the petition.

The petitioner, Sankara Narayanan of Nesil village, Vanur taluk, in Villupuram district, said his elder brother Anand Mohandoss (32) was a second engineer on the ship.

He drowned in the rough seas while attempting to swim ashore with some of his colleagues after their lifeboat capsized.

Mr. Narayanan said that after unloading oil, the vessel was in the outer anchorage of the port. It was not in a good condition and had neither fuel nor water for the crew. Food was available only once a day, he said.

His brother contacted the authorities several times and said the employees’ lives were at risk. But the authorities did not respond. The company that owned the vessel belonged to a close relative of a Union minister, Mr. Narayanan said.

Though the vessel, which had been in the seas for nearly 33 years, was not sea-worthy, it was permitted to operate. The petitioner alleged that his brother “died of starvation very soon after falling from the life boat.” This showed the company’s negligence, he said.

The petitioner’s counsel, S. Prabakaran, said if the company was allowed to move the ship from Chennai, the petitioner’s family and others would not receive any compensation.

The petitioner also sought an interim direction for inquiry into the matter by a district Judge and a compensation of Rs. 25 lakh for Mr. Mohandoss’ family.

Justice Vasanthakumar directed the petitioner’s counsel to serve notice to the additional solicitor-general and the company that owned the vessel.

The matter has been posted for November 7.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.