Gandhi would have opposed Ram temple built over demolished mosque, says activist

Speakers who gathered at the two-day Constitution and National Unity convention held by the Karnataka government in Bengaluru appealed to the masses for increased reliance on Constitutional values

February 24, 2024 11:16 pm | Updated February 26, 2024 11:51 am IST

Activist Medha Patkar chaired the session on ‘Fundamental rights, Directive principles and Citizenship’.

Activist Medha Patkar chaired the session on ‘Fundamental rights, Directive principles and Citizenship’. | Photo Credit: Special arrangement

At a time when India’s constitutional morality and founding ideas are being threatened, the citizens need to rely more and more on the Constitution and its values, said activists and scholars gathered on the first day of the two-day Constitution and National Unity Convention being organised by the Karnataka government.

Harsh Mander, activist and author, said that India is passing through a moment of “profound civilisational crisis.” Reminding that Mahatma Gandhi’s last fast was against the takeover of Muslim shrines by Hindus, he said that Gandhiji would not have been in favour of the Ram temple in Ayodhya today.

Focus on fraternity

He further added that when the Constitution was being drafted the people of India had promised themselves to build a country where every citizen is equal and that is the country we are losing every day with very little protest. “The true soul of a country lies in fraternity,” he said quoting Dr B.R. Ambedkar.

Citing the incident of a Muslim youth beaten to death in the suburbs of Delhi during Ganesh Puja last year, he pointed out that it happened in a densely populated locality and nobody came to the man’s aid.

“It is the same indifference we displayed when migrant workers walked several thousands of kilometres under the sun during lockdown… This civilisational crisis represents the gravest threat to India’s constitutional morality,” he said. “There is targeted demolition today. Structures are being demolished in a way that no mob could have achieved,” said Mr Mander.

Assert rights

Exhorting people to assert their right to equity, activist Medha Patkar, who chaired the session on “Fundamental rights, Directive principles and Citizenship”, called for a change in the current taxation policies and demanded that the richest should be compelled to pay wealth tax and inheritance tax.

“If even 1% of the richest are compelled to pay 2% wealth tax, more than ₹7 to ₹8 lakh crores will come to the state exchequer… How can this not be attempted and inserted into the economic action plan is our question,” she said, while pointing out that the state which is unwilling to write off the loans of the farmers, does it for corporates.

Ms. Patkar, who spearheaded the Narmada Bachao Andolan which resisted the construction of dams across the Narmada River, said that the central government, through amendments to the Forest Conservation Act, is ready to “hand over natural resources and forest lands to corporates” without even consulting with the Gramasabhas.

Ms. Patkar also spoke about the water crisis in Bengaluru and wondered whether there were no solutions to the problem other than relying on the pumping of water from the Cauvery River from several hundred kilometers away. “Is there no solution which can be through decentralised management of land, water, forest? We must compel the governments to think about it,” she said.

Rely on Constitution

Gopal Guru, editor at Economic and Political Weekly, noted that the closer one gets to their past, ethnicity and majoritarianism, the further one goes away from the rule of law and the principles of the Constitution.

“We have to rely more and more on the Constitution. Prejudices, casteism, patriarchy and communalism of the majoritarian kind arise when you get closer to parochialism instead of constitutionality,” he said, further adding that the tendency to rally around caste is the manifestation of lawlessness.

Mr. Guru noted that it is the moral and ethical duty of the government to take constitutional ideals to the people and if the government is not doing it then the judiciary has to monitor it and tame monstrous majoritarianism.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.