DVAC books case against nine School Education Dept. officials in Tiruchi

They are accused of violating the Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan (RMSA) guidelines in the procurement of furniture and lab equipment for 23 govt. schools

February 15, 2024 08:56 pm | Updated 08:57 pm IST - TIRUCHI

The Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC), Tiruchi unit, has registered a case against nine School Education Department officials, including two former Chief Educational Officers (CEO) of Tiruchi district and a former Assistant Director Programme Coordinator (RMSA Scheme). They have been accused of committing criminal breach of trust and not adhering to the guidelines under the Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan (RMSA) government funds in the procurement of furniture and lab equipment for 23 government schools in the district. The alleged offence was committed between 2019 and 2021.

The case was booked on February 5 under IPC sections 120 (b) (criminal conspiracy) and 409 (criminal breach of trust by public servant) and under sections 13 (2) read with 13 (1) (a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act based on a preliminary inquiry by the DVAC, Tiruchi unit. 

All the accused were still in service. R. Arivazhagan and S. Shanthi, former CEOs; S. Muthusamy, former Assistant District Programme Coordinator, RMSA Scheme, Tiruchi; R. Rajendran, former Headmaster, Government Higher Secondary School, Kanakilliyanallur; S. Sargunanan, former Headmaster, Oonaiyur Government High School; L.K. Akila, headmaster, Government High School, Inam Mathur; T. Daisy Rani, Teaching Assistant, Government Adi Dravidar Welfare High School, Koppampatti, Thuraiyur; J. Jaisingh, former Headmaster, Government Higher Secondary School, Venbanur; and S. Kannan, Headmaster, Government Higher Secondary School, Alagagoundanpatti, have been named as the accused.

The furniture were procured without calling for limited tender as per the guidelines. They were procured from the private firm instead of TANSI and other government industries thereby violating the tender procedure and with the dishonest intention to swindle the scheme funds.

It was found during the preliminary inquiry that the suppliers were not approved by the department. The preliminary inquiry made out cognisable offences against the nine officials and the case was booked after obtaining prior approval from the department, said the sources.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.