Revive film societies, says Kasaravalli

Stemming from a discussion on the film Koormavathara, which was screened on Sunday morning at the Nila Theatre, Mr. Kasaravalli delved into the larger notions of development and modernisation.

December 10, 2012 03:05 pm | Updated 03:05 pm IST - THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

The film question: Gireesh Kasaravally, film-maker, at an 'In conversation' programme organised as part of the International Film Festival of Kerala in Thiruvananthapuram on Sunday.  Photo: S. Mahinsha

The film question: Gireesh Kasaravally, film-maker, at an 'In conversation' programme organised as part of the International Film Festival of Kerala in Thiruvananthapuram on Sunday. Photo: S. Mahinsha

There was a movement, especially in regions like Kerala, when film societies flourished and there was a parallel world that supported art house films. This could be revived again, said Kannada film director, Girish Kasaravalli, cautioning that a balance needed to be attained to ensure that the production team also benefited from this process.

Speaking at Sunday’s ‘In Conversation’ segment with city-based filmmaker Shalini Nair, Mr. Kasaravalli recalled how he had even heard the label ‘Parasites’ used among production circles, to allude to film societies. “This is where they failed, in terms of financial support,” he said. In this respect, technological progress had a profound impact, in that it made it much easier for filmmakers to reach out to the viewers, he said.

“I welcome these new trends. They have liberated filmmaking from its shackles,” he said. He pointed out that distribution of cinema posed a major challenge and the Internet has rendered the role of the middleman obsolete. The director added that in time, filmmaking styles would also change with newer narrative patterns, aesthetic styles and approaches to documentation coming into play.

Stemming from a discussion on the film Koormavathara, which was screened on Sunday morning at the Nila Theatre, Mr. Kasaravalli delved into the larger notions of development and modernisation.

His film revolves around the protagonist, Anand Rao, who plays the role of Mahatma Gandhi in a television serial within the film. The essence of the story is to delineate the perception on ‘developed India’, from how Gandhi visualised it. “He was talking about the village and the community being central, but we are headed the opposite direction. The figure is made irrelevant by the people in power and the definition of development they have adopted,” opined the director.

He is also famed for mostly dealing with productions that are adaptations of Kannada literature.

Clearly, the few encounters he has had with Bollywood did not impress him for he stated clearly, “When I worked with Bollywood I had problems, and I decided to never work with that industry again.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.