Woman’s murder: HC upholds life term for 3

Court refuses relief to husband, mother-in-law and brother-in-law of victim

May 01, 2018 01:24 am | Updated 01:24 am IST - New Delhi

The Delhi High Court has upheld the life imprisonment given to a man, his widow mother and his unmarried brother for the murder of his wife, who used to quarrel with him frequently on living in a separate house.

Justice S. Muralidhar and Justice I. S. Mehta said the three accused failed to offer any explanation for the death of the deceased in their house with no one else being present or having entered the residence.

“This was a fairly small house where the three appellants and the deceased lived in two rooms,” the Bench said, adding, it is not the husband alone who will have to explain the unnatural death of the deceased in the house, but the mother and the brother as well.

The incident happened on the morning of May 10, 2013, on the top floor of a house in Mandawali’s Pandit Mohalla here. The husband had claimed that he was at his father-in-law’s house on the morning of the incident.

He, however, admitted that a quarrel did take place between the deceased and him regarding her insistence on living in a separate house.

Alibis of accused

His mother had claimed that she had gone to a temple at Chander Vihar at 7.30 a.m. and returned only at 9.40 a.m. His brother, who worked as a driver in Madhu Vihar, had claimed he had left for his employer’s house at 8 a.m.

The High Court, however, declined to accept the explanations put forth by the accused as “not believable”.

If indeed the husband found the deceased dead when he came back from the house of the in-laws, that would have been around 8.15 a.m. The mother returned from the temple around 9.30 a.m. It could not have taken them two hours thereafter to take the deceased to the hospital, the High Court noted.

“With each of them putting forth pleas of alibi, which have not been successfully proved by them, the completed chain of proved circumstances point unerringly only to the guilt of the three appellants and no one else,” the HC ruled.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.