‘Why does RTE not apply in nursery?’

Supreme Court asks Attorney-General to clarify issue; to hear case on Nov. 17

October 05, 2017 01:30 am | Updated 01:30 am IST - NEW DELHI

The Supreme Court on Wednesday asked Attorney-General K. K. Venugopal to address it on the issue that the Right to Education (RTE) Act, 2009, does not apply to children below the age of six, thus defeating every child’s fundamental right to get admission in nursery and kindergarten classes in unaided non-minority private schools.

A Bench led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra was hearing an appeal filed by NGO Social Jurist challenging the February 2013 decision of the Delhi High Court that the RTE Act was not applicable for nursery admissions in unaided private schools.

It had held that the RTE Act was only applicable to children whose age bracket was between 6 and 14 years of age.

The HC had concluded that States were free to formulate policies to govern nursery admissions.

Social Jurist, represented by advocate Ashok Agarwal moved the Supreme Court in 2015, pointing out that the High Court’s decision went against the very grain of Section 13 of the RTE Act.

Section 13 mandates that “no school or person shall, while admitting a child, collect any capitation fee and subject the child or his or her parents or guardian to any screening procedure”.

Mr. Agarwal submitted that the High Court’s decision opened the doors wide for private schools to collect capitation fee for nursery admissions. He said a child is usually admitted to the nursery when he or she is below the age of six, and “promoted” to Class I in due course. The opportunity for schools to collect capitation is at the time of nursery admission.


“It is illogical to say that if a child admitted in Class I or at the age of six, Section 13 of the RTE Act will apply and if a child is admitted in nursery or at the age of three plus, section 13 will not apply,” Mr. Agarwal submitted.

Mr. Venugopal also agreed that there was no regulatory mechanism for nursery admissions.

Chief Justice Misra acknowledged the lacuna, saying a “child cannot jump to the age of seven from zero”.

The case pertains to only “unaided non-minority private schools” because a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in its 2014 judgment in Pramati Educational and Charitable Trust versus Union of India had, while upholding the validity of Article 21A, held that the RTE Act does not apply to aided as well as unaided minority schools.

The court refused to refer the case to a larger Bench and scheduled the case for hearing on November 17.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.