Omar Abdullah challenges maintenance proceedings

High Court seeks estranged wife Payal Abdullah’s reply

November 17, 2017 02:00 am | Updated 02:00 am IST - New Delhi

Srinagar: File photo of Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah with wife Payal Nath Singh. Omar on Thursday announced he has separated from his wife Payal after 17 years of their marraige. PTI Photo by S Irfan(PTI9_15_2011_000072B)

Srinagar: File photo of Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah with wife Payal Nath Singh. Omar on Thursday announced he has separated from his wife Payal after 17 years of their marraige. PTI Photo by S Irfan(PTI9_15_2011_000072B)

The Delhi High Court on Thursday sought the stand of Payal Abdullah, the estranged wife of former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah, on his plea challenging maintenance proceedings in a family court here.

Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal asked Ms. Abdullah to file her response by November 24 on Mr. Abdullah’s plea claiming that the petition moved by her and their two sons seeking maintenance from him was not maintainable.

House in Delhi

During the hearing, the former Chief Minister’s lawyer argued before the High Court that Ms. Abdullah runs a business and has house in the Capital and therefore she has to first establish that she cannot maintain herself to be entitled for the relief.

The lawyer also contended that their two sons were adults now and therefore they too cannot seek maintenance.

In his plea, Mr. Abdullah has sought directions to the family court to first decide the maintainability of his estranged wife’s plea before it decides the issue of interim maintenance.

He has also challenged the family court’s September 9, 2016, order issuing summons to him in the maintenance case.

The next date of hearing before the family court is December 9, the lawyers told the High Court which, thereafter, listed the matter for further arguments on November 29.

A trial court had on August 30 last dismissed Mr. Abdullah’s plea seeking divorce from Ms. Abdullah, saying that he had failed to prove irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. His appeal in the High Court against the trial court’s decision is still pending.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.