How new excise policy turned into a political battleground in Delhi

Friday’s raids could turn the heat between AAP and BJP several notches higher

August 20, 2022 01:59 am | Updated July 03, 2023 04:26 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MP Sanjay Singh shows a placard after being detained during a protest against the CBI’s questioning of Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia in the liquor policy case, in New Delhi on Sunday, February 26, 2023. AAP’s Delhi government and the BJP locked horns ever since private liquor vends, under the Excise Policy 2021-22, opened in the city in November 2021. Since then both the parties have waged a war of words with each other, with the BJP accusing AAP’s Delhi government of a “liquor scam” and AAP accusing the BJP of trying to promote illicit liquor trade in the city. Image for representational purposes only.

Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MP Sanjay Singh shows a placard after being detained during a protest against the CBI’s questioning of Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia in the liquor policy case, in New Delhi on Sunday, February 26, 2023. AAP’s Delhi government and the BJP locked horns ever since private liquor vends, under the Excise Policy 2021-22, opened in the city in November 2021. Since then both the parties have waged a war of words with each other, with the BJP accusing AAP’s Delhi government of a “liquor scam” and AAP accusing the BJP of trying to promote illicit liquor trade in the city. Image for representational purposes only. | Photo Credit: Shiv Kumar Pushpakar

AAP’s Delhi government and the BJP locked horns ever since private liquor vends, under the Excise Policy 2021-22, opened in the city in November last year.

Since then both the parties have waged a war of words with each other, with the BJP accusing AAP’s Delhi government of a “liquor scam” and AAP accusing the BJP of trying to promote illicit liquor trade in the city.

Friday’s raid on the residence of Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia, who also holds the excise portfolio, has raised the stakes for both parties even higher.

The backdrop

An important event in this political battle between the two parties happened on July 22 when Lieutenant-Governor Vinai Kumar Saxena granted the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) permission to probe the Delhi Excise Policy 2021-22.

This was followed by the L-G suspending 11 officers of the Excise Department, including an IAS officer who headed the department when the policy was rolled out.

A week after the L-G gave permission to the CBI probe, AAP’s Delhi government decided to end the excise policy and go back to the ‘old regime’ of the retail liquor trade in the city asking the four government corporations which used to run retail liquor vends before November 17, 2021, to resume operations.

Promising change

The government had rolled out its new excise policy last year with a promise to “enhance the liquor-buying experience”, generate more revenue, and throttle the liquor mafia.

“The current retail experience is like a jail. When you go to a liquor shop, there is a grill and people rush and throw money to buy liquor. There is no dignity,” Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia had said in March 2021 while announcing the new excise policy.

The government, which operated over 475 vends (about 60% of total vends), completely pulled out of the liquor trade under the new policy and 849 new private vends — bigger, air-conditioned shops with glass doors and walk-in shopping — were scheduled to open from November 17, 2021.

Of these 849 vends, 844 were allowed to open in markets, malls, commercial areas, local shopping complexes etc.

The rest of the five were supposed to be super premium vends (SPV), spread across at least 2,500 sq. feet. and allowed to sell products only above ₹200 in case of beer and above ₹1,000 for all other spirits.

Chaotic start

But on November 17, the day when 844 new shops were supposed to open, a majority of the vends had empty shelves, very low stock, and some were still under construction, leaving customers high and dry.

In a few weeks, around 630-650 of the 844 vends opened to a positive reception, delivering on the promises of being bigger and temperature-controlled and allowing customers to walk in to make the purchase.

However, soon after the new excise policy came into effect, the BJP held protests outside many shops which they felt were too close to residential areas. Moreover, the five promised SPVs never opened.

Meanwhile, Mr. Sisodia, under the pressure of allegations of graft, held the previous L-G, Anil Baijal, responsible for making “last minute” changes to the new excise policy. The Deputy CM also accused Mr. Baijal of graft and demanded a CBI probe.

The former L-G retorted by issuing a statement which read, “The allegations now made by Shri Manish Sisodia are baseless and are motivated against me. Mr. Sisodia is trying to find some alibi for his and his colleague’s acts of commission and omissions.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.