‘Assembly panel proceedings were premeditated and biased’

Chief Secy tells High Court; next hearing on November 27

October 26, 2018 01:39 am | Updated 08:23 am IST - New Delhi

Chief Secretary Anshu Prakash

Chief Secretary Anshu Prakash

Chief Secretary Anshu Prakash on Thursday told the Delhi High Court that the entire process of summoning him before a Privileges Committee of the Assembly for questioning over certain issues was “biased and premeditated”.

The submission on behalf of Mr. Prakash was made before Justice Vibhu Bakhru. He commenced hearing of final arguments on the plea challenging the summons issued to Mr. Prakash by the Delhi Assembly’s Privileges Committee on a reference made by the Question and Reference Committee.

“The entire process was mala fide, biased and premeditated,” said senior advocate Siddharth Luthra and advocate Vivek Chib, appearing for the bureaucrat.

The lawyers argued that bias in proceedings was evident from the fact that both committees had the same members. After hearing brief submissions on behalf of Mr. Prakash, the court listed the matter for further arguments on November 27.

Notices to IAS officers

Apart from the Chief Secretary, the Privileges Committee had served notices on two other IAS officers — Cooperative Societies Registrar J.B. Singh and Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board Chief Executive Officer Shurbir Singh.

Both of them have also challenged the notices and summons issued to them, and their pleas are also tagged with that of Mr. Prakash. The Assembly has opposed the pleas contending that the court does not have the jurisdiction to look into committee proceedings and that the petitions were premature at this stage.

Mr. Prakash had moved the High Court in March this year after he was served a notice by the Privileges Committee for skipping a meeting on February 20. The meeting, in which he was asked to appear, was scheduled a day after he was allegedly assaulted by two AAP MLAs .

The court had earlier expressed displeasure over the panel not completing its breach of privilege proceedings against Mr. Prakash despite questioning him for nearly four hours. The court had on July 24 told Mr. Prakash that he was “adequately protected” against any punishment by the Assembly committee.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.