‘ASI norms applicable to eateries in Hauz Khas’

High Court rejects plea by eatery located in a structure violating height norms

March 16, 2018 01:20 am | Updated 01:20 am IST - New Delhi

The eatery had claimed that it was located on the second floor of the building along with other restaurants that were allowed to operate.

The eatery had claimed that it was located on the second floor of the building along with other restaurants that were allowed to operate.

The Delhi High Court has remarked that archaeological norms and building by-laws should be applicable to all restaurants and eateries in Hauz Khas, while directing the local authorities to act against violators.

Justice V.K. Rao gave the direction while rejecting the plea by a Hauz Khas eatery, which was shut down for being located in a structure of over 15 metre height, violating the rule laid down by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI).

‘Negative equality’

The eatery, Moonshine Café and Bar, had claimed that it was located on the second floor of the building along with other restaurants that were allowed to operate and had sought similar relief for itself.

The court rejected the contention saying it “cannot claim any negative equality” and dismissed the plea challenging the decision of the South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC) to close the eatery and revoke its licence.

The court, however, told the SDMC and other authorities concerned that if there was violation of any building by-laws or permission granted by the ASI, it “should be an impediment for everyone to run a restaurant”.

“The respondents cannot close their eyes and allow illegality to be perpetuated by other restaurants in the same building. The respondents are required to take action in that regard,” the court said.

The restaurant had challenged the SDMC’s August 17, 2017, decision through which its health trade licence was revoked and it was asked to shut shop.

The corporation had taken the decision as the eatery was running from a building that was more than 15 metres in height, which is not permitted in the area as per ASI norms.

Fire safety clearance

Besides that, other reasons cited by the corporation were that the eatery was being operated in unhygienic conditions and was catering to more than 48 persons without fire safety clearance.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.