‘Nothing survives’ in AAP plea on Delhi Assembly: SC

A five-judge Bench, while disposing of the AAP's petition seeking fresh polls, said: "Nothing survives in this petition."

November 11, 2014 11:15 am | Updated November 16, 2021 07:16 pm IST - New Delhi

A five-judge Supreme Court Bench headed by Chief Justice H.L. Dattu (in picture), on Tuesday disposed of the AAP's petition seeking fresh elections in Delhi. File photo: Sandeep Saxena

A five-judge Supreme Court Bench headed by Chief Justice H.L. Dattu (in picture), on Tuesday disposed of the AAP's petition seeking fresh elections in Delhi. File photo: Sandeep Saxena

The Supreme Court on Tuesday disposed of a petition filed by the Aam Aadmi Party seeking dissolution of the Delhi Assembly and holding fresh elections.

A five-judge Bench, headed by Chief Justice of India H.L. Dattu, said: “Now the Election Commission will take over.”

AAP lawyer Prashant Bhushan urged the court to keep the petition alive until the election was declared.

Disagreeing with the suggestion, Chief Justice Dattu, in a short order, observed, “Nothing survives in this petition.”

On November 4, President Pranab Mukherjee dissolved the Assembly on the recommendation of Lieutenant-Governor Najeeb Jung. The Assembly had been in suspended animation since mid-February as the major political parties declined to form the government.

The AAP petition challenged the decision to impose President’s rule in Delhi following the resignation of the Arvind Kejriwal government.

Hearing the petition in September, the court urged the Union government to act at the earliest to prevent “horse-trading.”

The Centre, represented by Additional Solicitor-General P.S. Narasimha, stuck to its position that government formation was in the legislative domain and it required time to see it through.

The AAP contended that the February 16 order imposing President’s rule was to frustrate the ongoing investigation in those corruption cases in which first information reports had been lodged by the Kejriwal government.

“The decision is not only arbitrary and illegal and in violation of the democratic rights of the citizens of Delhi but also mala fide,” the petition said.

It said imposition of President’s rule denied the citizens of Delhi their democratic right to have an elected popular government.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.