2020 riots | Share evidence against Khalid Saifi, HC tells police

February 07, 2024 01:16 am | Updated 02:23 am IST - NEW DELHI

‘Point out the case — the clinching material against him. What is his role?’ the court told the Delhi police counsel.

‘Point out the case — the clinching material against him. What is his role?’ the court told the Delhi police counsel. | Photo Credit: File Photo

:

The High Court on Tuesday asked the Delhi police to share evidence against ‘United Against Hate’ founder Khalid Saifi in an Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) case related to the alleged conspiracy behind the 2020 north-east Delhi riots.

“Point out the case — the clinching material against him. What is his role? In what manner did he conspire? How was he part of the conspiracy?” the court, which was hearing Mr. Saifi’s plea seeking bail in the UAPA case, told the Delhi police counsel.

“The court is not sitting for a story,” it remarked while posting the case for further hearing on February 12.

Mr. Saifi and several others were booked under UAPA and provisions of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly being the “masterminds” of the February 2020 riots in north-east Delhi that left 53 people dead and over 700 injured.

Special public prosecutor Amit Prasad on Tuesday told the court that before the communal violence broke out in February 2020, several people, including the UAH founder, student activists Sharjeel Imam, Umar Khalid, Devangana Kalita, Natasha Narwal, and others hatched a conspiracy to hold “disruptive chakka jams” and spread violence.

Mr. Prasad relied on messages exchanged on certain WhatsApp groups and urged the court also to consider the allegedly provocative speeches delivered by Mr. Imam.

Senior advocate Rebecca John, appearing for Mr. Saifi, said three accused – Asif Iqbal Tanha, Ms. Kalita and Ms. Narwal – who have been charged with more serious crimes have already been granted bail by the High Court.

Ms. John said her client, who admitted to running a protest site in Khajuri Khas, has been in custody for four years and charges have not been framed in the trial court and that he was a victim of custodial torture.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.