Retracing a father’s footsteps

Dissuaded by his father from joining the family shoe-trading business, Atul Sabharwal turned filmmaker. Now, in a documentary, he looks at Agra’s shoe industry.

March 14, 2015 05:50 pm | Updated December 05, 2021 09:08 am IST

cp in their shoes

cp in their shoes

AfterAurangzeb , a mainstream movie for Yash Raj studios, what made you decide on a documentary?

I get drawn to a project based on what I am feeling at that moment, the inner crisis I am facing. Aurangzeb was about three sons who leave their respective homes and their fathers in the physical sense or in a meta sense, by leaving their ideologies only to return home all battered and bruised. In Their Shoes is about sons who returned and those who didn't and won’t. Fathers make sons and In Their Shoes goes on to inspect what makes fathers, the history they lived through.

I guess Aurangzeb , in a way, left these emotions incomplete in me, and I thankfully found an avenue in In Their Shoes to dig deeper into them and hopefully exorcise myself.

In India, only a few “art film” makers have consistently alternated between features and documentaries. Given your interest in mainstream cinema, could being known as a “documentary guy” affect the kind of films you are offered?

I would like to believe that it won’t. I am not the first one to do this. Shyam Benegal, Wim Wenders and Martin Scorsese have made great fiction and documentaries. You somehow have to slip through the fingers of the people who are trying to put a label on you. That’s one of the givens for a film director, I believe. Then, somehow, find a way back. So I guess I’ll be fine whenever I want to make a mainstream film again.

The narrative begins with first-person accounts of how people came into this business and grows into an “India story,” about manufacturing shoes for the export market. Did you discover the scope of this story as you went along?

Most of it was a discovery as I went along. But having said that, my grandfather was a great storyteller and his favourite backdrop was the Partition. He used to tell us personal stories from pre-Partition India. And as I grew up to be a storyteller of sorts, I recollected my grandfather’s narratives and felt there was something very Grapes of Wrath -ish about the immigrants and refugees. I also had recollection from my childhood about a classmate who was known to be the son of one of the richest men in town. And then suddenly one day they lost their fortune. Where did their wealth go? It was a mystery to us kids in school. It went with the collapse of the USSR, I learnt later. So I had a vague memory of USSR’s collapse and its impact on the shoe market in Agra. By the time I was in 9th or 10th grade, there was this euphoria in my father’s voice about a magical scheme called VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme) introduced by Manmohan Singh. It seemed to be the answer to all my father’s prayers. These stories and incidents were somewhere in my subconscious and I discovered these within me as much as I discovered new things I had no clue of at all.

What made you choose to show the actual process of information gathering (the way we hear your voice here asking questions, and the subjects responding) versus doing the whole thing “invisibly,” with an omniscient narration?

I did not want to have an alien voice in the film. A commentary from a dubbing artist who is not a character in the film was something I resisted from the beginning. It was just one of those stubborn decisions you make, and then stick by.

The electronic music is an interesting choice. Given the Agra setting, one would have expected a more traditional-sounding score.

The soundscape of a film does not have to be in tandem with the visual-scape. The music is more for the mood of the story, for the subtext. I hope I am not intellectualising the choices. These things sometimes happen and they turn out to be “right decisions” because they feel right in the final film. That’s the extent of my articulating it.

Early on, in Agra, we see a sound guy with a boom mike. Then we see you in a dubbing room in Mumbai, with scenes from this very documentary playing on a screen in front of you. Why did you opt for this distancing framing device?

Call it some kind of confluence of the worlds of filmmaking and shoemaking: a collision of my world and my father’s. There were very few ways of suggesting visually that “this man’s son didn’t join the shoe business and is now a professional film director”. People who have heard of me or who have read about me would know, but what about others? That thought led to this approach. I don’t know yet if the technique works.

This is obviously a very personal story. Was making this documentary a form of catharsis, especially as your father is in the film too?

It was somewhat. Nothing can be fully cathartic though.

There are times one gets the feeling you almost yearn to be part of all this, and that some part of you is resentful of your father for stopping you from entering this business that has your — to borrow a phrase from the film — “buzurgon ka khoon” (blood of your ancestors).

I am not resentful at all. I am happy to be part of Dadasaheb Phalke’s legacy in our country. I always dreamt of being a filmmaker, and when I was in Agra I didn’t know how to turn this dream into a profession. I never told anyone in my family about this secret love. So my lazy choice was to join my father’s business. And it was my father’s foresight, heroism or sheer coincidence that he wanted his children to seek broader horizons.

For him, that meant that I become a Chartered Accountant or get an MBA degree. So he nudged me in one direction, life pulled me in another, and eventually I just gave in to the urge of my secret love for making movies. It’s just wishful thinking that one could gain this without losing out on the legacy of the shoe business of one’s ancestors. I just acted on that wishful thinking and gave it a tangible shape in the form of a film.

Your father wanted you out because he felt shoe trade wasn’t easy to be in. And yet, here you are, a filmmaker – as unsafe a profession as can be. What does your father feel about this?

I think he’s fine with it. He’s made his peace with it. Some of our relatives have often told me to make a blockbuster of Rohit Shetty proportions, as if it was as easy as just deciding and doing it. Their logic is that a money spinner or two will make you secure. I don’t know if my father is part of that brigade.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.