Gwyneth Paltrow not at fault for ski collision, jury decides

A jury dismissed the complaint against Paltrow and decided that the actor wasn’t at fault for the 2016 ski collision crash

March 31, 2023 04:23 pm | Updated 04:23 pm IST

Gwyneth Paltrow leaves court on March 30, in Park City, Utah

Gwyneth Paltrow leaves court on March 30, in Park City, Utah | Photo Credit: Kristin Murphy

Gwyneth Paltrow won her court battle over a 2016 ski collision at a posh Utah ski resort after a jury decided Thursday that the movie star wasn't at fault for the crash.

A jury dismissed the complaint of Terry Sanderson, a retired optometrist who sued Paltrow over injuries he sustained when the two crashed on a beginner run at Deer Valley ski resort, siding with Paltrow after eight days of live-streamed courtroom testimony that made the case a pop culture fixation.

"I felt that acquiescing to a false claim compromised my integrity," Paltrow said in a statement released by her representatives. She also thanked the judge and jury for their work.

Also Read:Netflix’s ‘The Goop Lab’: A peek into Gwyneth Paltrow’s holistic wellness empire

As Paltrow left court she touched Sanderson's shoulder and said, "I wish you well," he told reporters outside the courthouse. He responded, "Thank you dear." Her attorney, Steve Owens, added in a statement he read outside court that "Gwyneth has a history of advocating for what she believes in – this situation was no different and she will continue to stand up for what is right."

Paltrow, an actor who in recent years has refashioned herself into a celebrity wellness entrepreneur, looked to her attorneys with a pursed lips smile when the judge read the eight-member jury's verdict in the Park City courtroom. She sat intently through two weeks of testimony in what became the biggest celebrity court case since actors Johnny Depp and Amber Heard faced off last year.

The attorney fees Paltrow demanded in her countersuit were not included in the jury's verdict, leaving the bulk of the final award for the Park City judge to decide.

The dismissal concludes two weeks of courtroom proceedings that hinged largely on reputation rather than the monetary damages at stake in the case. Paltrow's attorneys described the complaint against her as "utter B.S." and painted the Goop founder-CEO as uniquely vulnerable to unfair, frivolous lawsuits due to her celebrity.

Paltrow took the witness stand during the trial to insist the collision wasn't her fault, and to describe how she was stunned when she felt "a body pressing against me and a very strange grunting noise." Throughout the trial, the word "uphill" became synonymous with "guilty", as attorneys focused on a largely unknown skiing code of conduct that stipulates that the skier who is downhill or ahead on the slope has the right of way.

Worldwide audiences followed the celebrity trial as if it were episodic television. Viewers scrutinized both Paltrow and Sanderson's motives while attorneys directed questions to witnesses that often had less to do with the collision and more to do with their client's reputations.

The trial took place in Park City, a resort town known for hosting the annual Sundance Film Festival, where early in her career Paltrow would appear for the premieres of her movies including 1998's Sliding Doors, at a time when she was known primarily as an actor, not a lifestyle influencer. Paltrow is also known for her roles in Shakespeare in Love and the Iron Man movies.

The jury's decision marks a painful court defeat for Sanderson, the man who sued Paltrow for more than USD 300,000 over injuries he sustained when they crashed on a beginner run. Both parties blamed the other for the collision. Sanderson, 76, broke four ribs and sustained a concussion after the two tumbled down the slope, with Paltrow landing on top of him.

He filed an amended complaint after an earlier USD 3.1 million lawsuit was dismissed. Paltrow in response countersued for USD 1 and attorney fees, a symbolic action that mirrors Taylor Swift's response to a radio host's defamation lawsuit. Swift was awarded USD 1 in 2017.

Paltrow's defense team represented Sanderson as an angry, aging and unsympathetic man who had over the years become "obsessed" with his lawsuit against Paltrow. They argued that Paltrow wasn't at fault in the crash and also said, regardless of blame, that Sanderson was overstating the extent of his injuries.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.