Microsoft, Adani against submarine cable stake requirement

The firms were aligned with telcos’ opposition to the requirement that undersea cable operators in India should have a significant stake in cable systems they operate.

February 14, 2023 12:49 pm | Updated February 15, 2023 02:03 am IST - NEW DELHI

A file photo of a work in progress for an undersea cable to connect Andamans at Pattinampakkam in Chennai. File photo for representational purpose only.

A file photo of a work in progress for an undersea cable to connect Andamans at Pattinampakkam in Chennai. File photo for representational purpose only. | Photo Credit: B. Velankanni Raj

Microsoft Corporation and Adani Data Networks Ltd have told the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) that telecom operators who run the landing stations for undersea cables — through which the bulk of global internet traffic moves between countries — should not be required to have a significant stake in the cable systems they are connecting to Indian networks.

Microsoft said that the cloud industry’s growth required companies like itself to make significant investments into international data traffic, even though these companies aren’t telecom operators. “A licensing regime that forces a licensed operator to be a partner in the cable system itself will impose financial burdens on those operators, and it will unnecessarily limit the amount of cable capacity serving India,” Ashutosh Chadha, Microsoft’s Director and Country Head Public Policy for India wrote in the submission.

Adani Data Networks said in its submission that while the portion of these cables in Indian waters should be owned by the International Long Distance Operator (ILDO) that is operating that portion, “defining [percentage] ownership in [the] consortium would not be [a] viable option in new consortium models,” citing the huge costs involved in laying submarine cables internationally.

These submissions came in response to a TRAI consultation initiated after the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) flagged the issue of Sify Technologies, Bharti Airtel and Reliance Jio not owning a stake in cable systems they operated. The regulatory situation is uncertain, but these systems have received interim approval. Sify said in its submission that “[f]or those operators seeking to focus their engagement on specific countries such as only India joining the consortium is unviable.” Jio backed this view, saying that the stake requirement was burdensome, as did BSNL.

Airtel’s submission was different: it said that ILDOs should be required to have a 10% stake in future cable systems, but that existing cable systems should not be subject to this requirement. The telco has a 20% stake in the SEA-ME-WE-6 cable system, according to a press release it issued in February 2022.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.