No merit in Sahara review plea, rules Supreme Court

Last year, group told to deposit Rs. 17, 400 crore with 15% interest with SEBI

Updated - November 17, 2021 05:12 am IST

Published - January 09, 2013 11:21 pm IST - New Delhi:

The Supreme Court has rejected the Sahara group’s plea to review the August 31, 2012 order by a Bench which directed it to deposit Rs.17,400 crore with 15 per cent interest with the Securities and Exchange Board of India within three months. This order has not been complied with.

Nor did Sahara adhere to a December 5, 2012 order, a breather given by another Bench, headed by Chief Justice of India Altamas Kabir, asking it to deposit Rs. 5,120 crore immediately and pay investors in two instalments — Rs. 10,000 crore in the first week of January 2013 and the balance including interest in the first week of February.

The Bench passed this order when the Sahara group sought more time to repay the amount to the investors — money it had collected through Optionally Fully Convertible Debentures (OFCD).

‘All contentions examined’

Rejecting the review petitions filed by both the Sahara India Real Estate Corporation and the Sahara Housing Investment Corporation, the same Bench, headed by Justice K.S. Radhakrishnan, which passed the August 31, 2012 order, said on Tuesday: “We find none of the grounds has been made out for review of our judgment. We also do not find any inconsistency in the views expressed by both of us [the other judge on the Bench was Justice J.S. Khehar]. On the other hand, all contentions, legally and factually, raised by the appellants were examined, addressed and answered on all possible angles and dimensions. Applications are stated to have been filed for placing new facts and documents on record for which the ingredients mentioned in Order XLVII(1)(c) have also not been satisfied. Even otherwise, all records placed before us were meticulously examined and dealt with.”

As a sequel to the dismissal of the review petitions, “applications seeking permission for open court listing, intervention and directions/stay also stand dismissed.”

On the review petition filed by the Universal Investors Association, the Bench said: “The applicants have no locus standi to move it. Further, no grounds have been made out calling for review of our judgment.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.