Review insolvency code regulations, NCLT tells bankruptcy board

Tribunal raises concern about the functioning of resolution professionals

May 06, 2018 08:35 pm | Updated May 07, 2018 02:13 pm IST - New Delhi

On steeplechase:  Adjudicating authority is facing too many interruptions from stakeholders, says NCLT

On steeplechase: Adjudicating authority is facing too many interruptions from stakeholders, says NCLT

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has suggested to IBBI that there is a need to review the insolvency code regulations to ensure that they are not “misused or misinterpreted“.

It also said that the resolution professional (RP) should be competent and independent so that there are no interruptions in the process which lead to delays in disposal of insolvency cases.

‘Claims ignored’

Besides, it has said that the claims of operational creditors are neglected or ignored as the Committee of Creditors (CoC) (banks and financial institutions) have control over the entire process.

Nobody is taking care of operational creditors’ claims, said the NCLT Kolkata Bench in its order passed last week on the Binani Cement matter.

“It is time to recognise their voice also in the committee of creditors,” it said, suggesting changes to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI).

In the 60-page order, the tribunal has also raised concern about the functioning of RPs, saying it has been receiving several pleas from stakeholders on issues such as transparency, arbitrariness and delays in the process. “The adjudicating authority (NCLT) is facing too much interruption from various stakeholders. Till date we have never come across any frivolous application. All come with a genuine grievance. All challenge the independence of the resolution professional and lack of transparency, competency and arbitrariness in the matter of resolution process,” said NCLT.

Citing Binani Cement case, NLCT said: “In the case in hand, 12 applicants came forward ...for not following the process mandated under the code by the resolution process. The arbitrary way of dealing with the cases has always led to interruptions and also caused delay in disposal of cases.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.