Sushil will not go to Rio as court rejects plea for trial

June 06, 2016 03:26 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 04:29 am IST - New Delhi

New Delhi, 17/07/2012: Wrestler Sushil Kumar, during a send off function for the Olympics in New Delhi on 17, July, 2012. Photo: S_Subramanium

New Delhi, 17/07/2012: Wrestler Sushil Kumar, during a send off function for the Olympics in New Delhi on 17, July, 2012. Photo: S_Subramanium

“All I am asking for is a trial for Rio Games” — the plea by the two-time Olympic medallist Sushil Kumar was on Monday rejected by the Delhi High Court, which said his argument made for “an interesting sound-bite” but was legally untenable.

“In the international arena of sports, medals are won not only by ‘brawl’ but also by ‘brain’. The last-minute challenge can disturb the mental preparation of the selected... A sportsperson innocently asking for ‘just a trial’ may be jeopardising the chances of the selected candidate to win, having disastrous consequences for national interest,” a Bench said.

“In the duel asked for, the country will be the loser,” said a bench of Justice Manmohan while dismissing Sushil Kumar's plea for selection trial with Narsingh Yadav for representing India in the 74kg freestyle category at the Rio Olympics.

The court did not lose sight of the high probability of injury if a trial is ordered now with just two months to go for the Olympics

Notice to WFI official

Issuing a notice to Raj Singh, the vice-president of Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) as to why perjury proceedings be not initiated against him for lying in an affidavit, Justice Manmohan said, “the Court only hopes that the present litigation is not an offshoot of internal politics of respondent no. 4 —WFI — in which a wrestler has been 'led down the garden path' by an office bearer and/or has been used 'as a pawn' to settle his own score either way.” Mr. Singh had wrongly claimed there were trials in 1996 Atlanta Games between Pappu Yadav and Kaka Pawar. The WFI had clarified that it was only a wild card quota for India back then and Mr Singh was not the coach.

The bench found that without exception, only the quota winners have represented India in the Olympics without undergoing any trial and termed “crucial” the fact that India would have not had a berth in the 74kg category had Narsingh Yadav not won a Bronze in the World Championship September 2015.

(This report has been edited for a factual error)

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.