Tell a player clearly if he is in or out of reckoning

‘Rested’ euphemism is bound to hurt an affected stalwart like Yuvraj

August 15, 2017 10:07 pm | Updated 10:37 pm IST - NEW DELHI

Yuvraj Singh.

Yuvraj Singh.

An impact player has been dealt a kind of blow that has haunted many performers in Indian cricket.

Can he come back? Only Yuvraj Singh can answer that question. Or, should one say, only the team management and the National selectors can shed light on this development that could shake the confidence of a man who announced his arrival 17 years ago at Nairobi with a stunning assault on the famed Australian bowlers.

“Rested,” said selection committee chairman M.S.K. Prasad in reference to Yuvraj’s omission from the one-day series against Sri Lanka.

The term “rested” has often been used conveniently by the decision-makers when dealing with stalwarts. But it certainly hurts the affected player if he learns of his fate through the media and not from the chairman of selectors.

 

Yuvraj, it may be noted, marked his presence with a 150 against England at Cuttack in his second match of the comeback phase early this year. He has won two man-of-the-match awards in the last 10 matches, more than any other team-mate.

At the ICC Champions Trophy in England last June, Yuvraj produced what skipper Virat Kohli described as a “game changing” knock against Pakistan. “Yuvi’s innings, I think, was the game-changing innings. I felt like a club batsman while playing alongside Yuvi, the way he was hitting the ball. He took all the pressure off me and played the way only he can,” said Kohli.

The graceful left-hander finds himself at a difficult crossroads. If age is to be held against Yuvraj — he is 35 and not as swift as he was once — but then he is not the oldest member.

In Dinesh Karthik’s case, there has been no explanation. The dashing stroke-maker from Tamil Nadu, who made clear his desire to be only considered as a batsman and not as a wicketkeeper-batsman, earned his slot following a fabulous domestic season.

His comeback, after three years in exile, has lasted just two innings (2 and 50 not out) against the West Indies last month. There is no talk of his future role.

True, the selectors have a tough choice. They have to accommodate K. L. Rahul, who has the backing of the team management. They have to find place for Manish Pandey, again backed by the team management. But it would help if players are told in clear terms that they have been dropped rather than use the ‘rested’ euphemism.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.