Prasanna: IPL a big boost for domestic players

'Controversies are a wake-up call for team owners'

May 25, 2012 10:00 am | Updated July 11, 2016 08:40 pm IST

E.A.S. Prasanna

E.A.S. Prasanna

Ian Chappell rated this Bangalorean as the finest spinner ever. The former Australian captain introduced him as a “great spinner” while talking to another wizard — Shane Warne.

At 72, E.A.S. Prasanna still remains alert to cricket's rapid evolution. The off-spin legend, who took 189 Test wickets and has a combined first-class tally of 957 scalps, spoke about the Indian Premier League (IPL) and its varied influences on cricket.

Excerpts:

Q. Do you think the recent off-field controversies have dented the IPL brand?

A. I don't think so. I believe that the IPL is a strong brand, and if there are off-field issues, you cannot blame the Board of Control for Cricket in India. It's all about individual players and team managements. The recent controversies are, perhaps, a wake-up call for the owners.

Has the IPL's big bucks affected players?

There is big money in IPL, but look at the larger picture – how many domestic cricketers can play for India? Now, with the IPL, many players are getting instant recognition. In distant towns, where cricket would have just been a recreational sport, parents now feel that the game can provide stability to their children, as IPL teams need more local players.

The Twenty20 format's impact on a player's technique has triggered many debates.

It all depends on the mindset of a player. No bowler can think “Oh, I am bowling to Chris Gayle and it will be difficult.”

A spinner has to bowl according to the match situation and not get bogged down by the batsman, be it a Gayle or a Sachin Tendulkar. Now, people are talking about the off-spinner Sunil Narine, who plays for the Kolkata Knight Riders.

Let him play in Tests and then I will pass my judgement.

Do you mean to say “never judge a player on the basis of his IPL exploits”?

My reply would be both “yes” and “no”. You, obviously, cannot judge a bowler because he gets only four overs. You need to observe a bowler for a longer duration. But as far as a batsman is concerned, you can at one level judge him because if he can bat through 20 overs and score an 85, then he can do the same in a Test match.

What is the way forward for the IPL?

Maybe after a few years you could have a rule — eight to bat and 11 to field. These restrictions will test the captain as he has to use bowling options from within this eight-member team while he can have three additional fielders. It will also add an element of uncertainty and make the match more interesting.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.