Binny deserves at least an explanation

Hopefully, either Kumble or Prasad will speak to Binny and offer him a reasonable explanation.

November 04, 2016 12:11 am | Updated November 17, 2021 06:20 am IST - MYSURU:

Whether Hardik Pandya deserves to be in India’s Test squad is a completely different topic of discussion but the Baroda all-rounder’s selection does seem unfair to Stuart Binny.

After all, the Karnataka all-rounder, for a better part of the last three years, has been the prime stakeholder for the pace-bowling all-rounder’s slot.

Had Binny been given an opportunity and failed to impress in India’s white flannels, his omission would have been understood. However, the fact that Binny was overlooked after being made to fetch drinks all through the two-month long tour of the West Indies earlier this season does question the rejigged selection panel’s decision to look beyond him for options.

While Binny was a certainty in the scheme of things of the previous selection panel headed by Sandeep Patil, the new chief selector, M.S.K. Prasad, seems to have preferred Pandya over Binny for a variety of reasons.

Prasad’s assessment

“If you look at the three all-rounders we have — Stuart Binny, Hardik Pandya and Rishi Dhawan — when it comes to this particular series, and if you want to have one bowler who can really bat, this is where he (Pandya) scores over Binny. He is a much better bowler than Binny and in batting also he is doing really well,” Prasad said after announcing the squad for the first two of the five Tests against England on Wednesday.

“Stuart is also being considered but as of now with form, fitness and other aspects, we feel that Hardik is a much better option.”

Such justification would be a severe jolt for Binny, especially, in the wake of the message that was passed on to him by team coach Anil Kumble.

According to Binny, when he was omitted for the three-Test series against New Zealand, Kumble had called him up and asked him to return to domestic cricket “because I could be called up at any point, that was the message passed on to me”.

At the receiving end

Binny had been at the receiving end for home assignments but only because the selectors and the team management didn’t feel the need for a pace-bowling all-rounder in the squad.

In fact, he was quite impressed with the manner in which Kumble had struck a dialogue with him.

“The message has been put across to me before but I don’t think it was put across the way it was this time,” Binny had said last week after scoring a sterling 156 to set up Karnataka’s victory against Assam in a Ranji Trophy tie in Mumbai.

“It was very clear about what I needed to do. I needed to go and play some domestic cricket. I was just sitting on the bench for three months in the West Indies, rotting.

“But I needed to spend some time in the middle. You can have a hundred net sessions but it’s not the same as playing a game.”

Hopefully, either Kumble or Prasad will speak to Binny and offer him a reasonable explanation.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.